Acts 19:23-41 – The Riot in Ephesus

The riot in Ephesus (Ats 19:23-41) is an important story in the developing plot-line of Acts, although Paul is not really a part of the story.  We are told that the silversmiths fear the rise of Christianity in Ephesus, Paul’s companions are arrested, and the city manager calms the crowd.  The reader does not know what happens to Paul during and after the riot.

For this reason, some speculate that he was arrested and imprisoned in Ephesus, a time reflected in 1 Cor 15:32, “if I fought the wild beasts in Ephesus…”  The implication is that Paul was forced into some sort of gladiatorial punishment, although the text may refer to his opponents rather than literal animals.  If Paul was in prison in Ephesus, then he may very well have written Philippians, Colossians and Philemon while under arrest, rather than from Rome.  This is all argument from silence and not particularly persuasive, but it does solve some problems with those books.

Artemis

The main point, however, is that Christianity has made such an impact on the culture of Ephesus that the culture attempts to “fight back.”  At the end of this attack on Paul’s mission in Ephesus, we are told that what Paul preaches is not against Rome nor is it illegal according to Roman Law.  This seems to be a major sub-text in the unit; Luke wants to inform us that the Romans found Christianity compatible with Roman Law.

A second problem addressed by this section of Acts is the “parting of the ways” – when did Christianity become distinct from Judaism?  As far as the Romans are concerned, in Acts 19 Christianity is still the same thing as Judaism.  In Acts 18 the Jews in Corinth argued that Paul was not one of them.  In the riot at Ephesus the crowds do not make a distinction between Alexander (a Jew) and the Christians.  At this point in the development of Christianity, any decision about the Christians may have had an indirect impact on the Jewish community.

Perhaps the most important theme of this incident is the fact that Christianity challenged the greatest pagan cult in the ancient world and was seen as a serious threat to that cult. I think that this is the challenge of the story – how has contemporary Christianity impacted culture?

The answer is (sadly) either “not at all” or as something which secular society mocks and then promptly ignores.

6 thoughts on “Acts 19:23-41 – The Riot in Ephesus

  1. The riot in Ephesus, was undoubtably related to Christians presenting a challenge to the pagan culture of Ephesus, which I believe we as Christians now a days should present a similar challenge to our secular culture. The fact of the matter is that the people living in Ephesus were directly effected by the worship of their God’s and their temple. Consequently, these people were worried that Paul and his accusations about their God not being real was indeed going to endanger trade, the temple, and the divinity of Artemis (Acts 19:37). Furthermore it is easy to see how discrediting their God would have indeed effected numerous aspects of their life. Due to these accusations against these peoples God, a mob began to form and shout, “Great is Artemis” (Acts 19:28). Paul however did not back down from these accusations but instead, “Paul wanted to appear before the crowd” (Acts 19:30). So though the rejection of the Ephesus culture and their God’s was single handily the cause of the riot, Paul was not afraid to stand against them. This type of cultural impact is something that we as modern day Christians should seek to model. This is because like the post says, “Christianity has made such an impact on the culture of Ephesus that the culture attempts to fight back,” so the actions of these Christians should encourage us to make a similar cultural impact today. This is something that we should not fear but instead be confident in God that if we provoke our culture by speaking his word, he will in turn protect us, as he did the Christians in Ephesus. I too believe that Christianity has become stagnant and somewhat of a joke in our culture today. I think this can be attributed to the modern Christian not speaking or taking a stance against what is wrong, as the Christians did in Ephesus.

    Like

  2. Nick has some really good points. Going off from what he said, “…was indeed going to endanger trade, the temple and the divinity of Artemis,” I think it’s important to recognize that Christianity was valued more. They valued worshiping God more than what most Christians probably do today. So when someone criticizes their lifestyle, they fight back. I think that today, Christians don’t care to defend God and their beliefs. If someone says something negative about God, then our reaction can be very powerless. We might just say, it’s what I believe, you believe what you believe. I think this conversation can swing back to Christianity being a lifestyle. Whenever someone criticizes country music, I get defensive. Whenever someone criticizes what I like to do, what I like to watch (Nascar), then I get defensive. But if someone were to say that they are uncertain about my what I believe, would I react in a similar way? And not even in a similar way, but with even more fervor? This is what Christians need to ask themselves. Is this important to them, important enough to be powerful in defense of God.

    Like

  3. The riot in Ephesus was first of all motivated by Demetrius and other craftsmen who were losing money because the Christian message turned people away from worshiping Artemis. Their job was to make shrines for Artemis and if the people stopped worshiping Artemis, the craftsmen’s business would have decline significantly. But in his speech, Demetrius adds in political and religious reasons to cause an uproar against Paul and his companions. “There is danger not only that our trade will lose its good name, but also that the temple of the great goddess herself will be discredited and the goddess herself…will be robbed of her divine majesty” (Acts 19:27). Upon hearing this, the people started a riot. So I would agree that the gospel challenged the the greatest cult of that time. However, I think that the current U.S. culture is a bit different. The difference I see is that Ephesus was primarily run by a pagan cult before the gospel was widely preached there. The U.S. began with the Christian message already being preached, and over time has begun to lose steam. But I think the point remains the same that Christianity needs to be impacting culture more. I think to an extent it already has been, as there have been so much focus on homosexual marriage and abortion. I think Christians have been trying to hold on to the Biblical views, but have seen the culture slip away from that. So the challenge I think is for us to present Christianity and the gospel in a new and fresh way. I suggest we focus on how the gospel impacts relationships. But as we do that, we must do so with confidence that God’s Word is powerful and what He has done for us is life changing.

    Like

  4. I believe that nothing in this world happens by accident. I believe that the Lord has a hand in all things. How interesting that I would come across your blog. I usually don’t respond to blogs, but today I feel compelled to do so.
    You stated that ” the important theme of this incident is the fact that Christianity challenged the greatest pagan cult in the ancient world and was seen as a serious threat to that cult.” Truer words were never spoken!!

    As a former Catholic, I use to believe that apparitions and miracles associated with “Our Lady” (which Catholics worship as the Blessed Virgin) were divinely inspired. Not anymore.

    In studying Acts, I came across a verse that has me curious and apprehensive. In Acts 19:23-41, Paul visits Ephesus and attempts to introduce Christianity to them. As we all know, Acts was written for the time following Pentecost and those early years of the Church, around 40 A.D.

    After a run in with Demetrius, a silversmith whose business was making idols to the goddess Artemis, a riot broke out, as we see in the following passage:

    “And when the town clerk had appeased the people, he said, Ye men of Ephesus, what man is there that knoweth not how that the city of the Ephesians is a worshipper of the great goddess Diana, and of the image which fell down from Jupiter?”
    Acts 19:35

    According to Spanish tradition, on January 2, 40 A.D., in the apparition of “Our Lady of the Pillar”, the Virgin Mother gives a statue of herself to James the Greater and requests a temple be built in her honor. Incidentally, Biblical Mary was still alive at the time.

    In Acts, the people of Ephesus worshiped at the temple to the goddess Artemis/Diana and of her image (idol), which fell from heaven.

    The Temple of Artemis at Ephesus, in Turkey, is listed as one of the “Seven Wonders of the Ancient World.” Incidentally, the House of The Virgin Mary is located in Ephesus. Which, coincidentally, is the first church ever dedicated to the honor of “Our Lady.” (25) http://www.divinemysteries.info/our-lady-of-the-pillar-zaragoza-spain-40ad/

    Doesn’t it seem odd that it was here, in Ephesus, that the Christian Council of Ephesus, in A.D. 431, proclaimed Mary “Mother of God”, which, by the way, was formerly a title given the great goddesses? It seems unlikely that divine providence brought Biblical Mary and one of the most revered goddesses, of her time, together in one place, for one purpose. It’s more likely that Satan had a hand in what would become one of the most blatant forms of idol worship to occur in the modern world and in such a way that to renounce it would appear to renounce Christ himself.

    Brigitte Romankiewicz reports that, at the time of the Council, many shrines to Isis and Cybele had been abandoned by decree of the Roman Empire. Now the Council decided to christen 48 of them into shrines to the Virgin Mary. (26) “Die Schwarze Madonna: Hintergruende einer Symbolgestalt”, Patmos Verlag, 2004, p. 50)

    I think that the Bible may, in fact, be describing what I believe is a reference to “Our Lady of the Pillar” which was actually the worship of Artemis.

    Could it be that the Catholic Church took a pagan event and somehow merged it into the beginning of a “Marian” tradition?

    Throughout history, there are numerous accounts of “Our Lady” appearing to devout Christians. These apparitions all have one thing in common. Every one of them requests homage to her, in one form or another. Why would Jesus’ mother focus attention on herself, when her Son is the source of our salvation? As a devoted mother and being totally obedient to God, I can tell you, she would never do that!!!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.