Waltke, Bruce K., James M. Houston, Erika Moore. The Psalms as Christian Lament: A Historical Commentary. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 2014. 328 pp., Pb., $28.00. Link to Eerdmans
This book is a follow-up to The Psalms as Christian Worship (Eerdmans, 2010). Like the previous volume, The Psalms as Christian Lament aims to provide “informed historical-theological-pastoral insights into ten lament psalms,” while the others provide a basis for a “theology of lament.” In order to achieve this goal, each chapter begins with a short history of interpretation before turning to an exegetical study of the Psalm. Sometimes, this historical study includes a single scholar; other times, several are included.
Why study these particular Psalms? As the authors point out in their introduction, Christians often struggle with the idea of lament. Our worship tends to be positive and uplifting, but a congregation rarely offers a lament to the Lord as a form of worship. Yet the Psalter includes many worship songs in which the psalmist cries out before the Lord, lamenting their suffering and oppression. According to the introduction, there are forty-two individual laments and another sixteen corporate laments. This means lament is one of the dominating genres in the Psalter.
The book studies ten lament psalms, including six of the seven traditional penitential psalms (Psalm 51 appears in the previous volume). Each chapter begins by listening to the “voice of the church.” In this section, James Houston selects one or more ancient commentaries on the Psalm as an example of how the Psalm was read at various points in church history. By examining the range of ancient and medieval writers on the following list, it seems clear the examples were chosen to provide various kinds of commentary on the Psalms. There is both chronological and theological diversity in the chosen commentators. Houston does not quote the historical commentaries at length, so in this sense, the book is not the same sort of tool as the Ancient Christian Commentaries (InterVarsity Press). After introducing the writer and placing him in a historical context, Houston focuses on how the individual writer drew theological implications from the Psalm under examination.
- Psalm 5 and Jerome.
- Psalm 6 and Gregory of Nyssa.
- Psalm 7 and Chrysostom, Charlemagne, Alcuin and Alfred the Great.
- Psalm 32 and Augustine.
- Psalm 38 and Ambrose, Augustine, Theodore of Mopsuestia, Cassiodorus and several medieval penitential commentaries.
- Psalm 39 and Erasmus.
- Psalm 44 and Origin, Aquinas, Luther, and Calvin.
- Psalm 102 and Catholic vs. Reformed/Evangelical repentance.
- Psalm 130 and Hilary of Poitiers and John Owen.
- Psalm 143, Augustine, a few medieval penitential commentaries, and John Calvin.
After this historical section, for nine of the chapters, Bruce Waltke provides a new translation of the psalm with textual notes on syntax and textual variants. Erika Moore provides the translation and exegesis for Psalm 39. After his translation, Waltke sets the literary context of the Psalm by observing canonical links to nearby Psalms. For example, Psalm 32 has a number of lexical and thematic links to Psalm 31, implying the two Psalms could be read together. This juxtaposition in the canon of the Psalter can provide some insights for interpretation. In addition to literary context, Waltke comments briefly on Form Critical approaches to the Psalm. For the most part, this is a short note explaining why the Psalm is a lament or penitential Psalm. Waltke also briefly comments on “Rhetorical Criticism,” by which he means the structure of the Psalm (stanza, strophe, etc.) Sometimes, these are summed up in a single section on “form and structure,” and the headings are inconsistent in the book. In the final section before the commentary, he briefly summarizes the “message of the Psalm.”
In the body of the commentary, Waltke proceeds more or less verse-by-verse based on the structure of the Psalm outlined in his Rhetorical Criticism section. This is a technical, exegetical commentary, and Hebrew appears in the body of the commentary, often untransliterated. I noticed that the Hebrew is always transliterated in Moore’s commentary on Psalm 32. The body of the commentary runs ten-twelve pages on average, a few are longer. Since commentaries on the Psalms are usually sparse in exegetical detail and nuance, I am very pleased with Waltke’s exegesis of the Hebrew Bible.
Conclusion. Like the previous volume, The Psalms as Christian Lament: A Historical Commentary will appeal to many Christians who want to read the Hebrew Bible through the lens of some of the greatest exegetes of the Church. Although it does not provide access to the original commentaries of these ancient writers, the summaries will give most readers a sense of how Christians have approached Psalms of laments at various times in history.
However, I think the organization of the chapters could be improved. I would have preferred to have the historical material after the exegetical section. To my way of thinking, I prefer to have a solid idea of what the Hebrew text actually says before encountering how it was understood later in Church history. Placing the historical section first cannot help by color the reading of the Psalm, perhaps obscuring the meaning of the text as it appears in the Hebrew Bible. To be fair, the book is subtitled A Historical Commentary; any reader who shares my suspicion of Reception Criticism can read the sections in reverse order.
Reading how the later church understood a particular Psalm is important, and I appreciate these sections (especially since church history is not my specialty). This project makes me wonder if a similar book could be written that focuses on the Psalms as Jewish Scripture. I would be very interested in reading a commentary with the same level of exegetical rigor but traces the reception of selected Psalms through the Second Temple Period (including the New Testament), then beyond the Second Temple Period into medieval Jewish exegesis. I know bits and pieces of this exist, but I know of nothing like this single readable volume for Jewish exegesis.
The Psalms as Christian Lament is an excellent contribution to the study of the Psalms if only for Waltke’s exegetical comments. That the Christian history of interpretation is included is a bonus.
NB: Thanks to Eerdmans for kindly providing me with a review copy of this book. This did not influence my thoughts regarding the work.