Galatians 4:21-5:1 – Sarah and Hagar

This is the final stage in Paul’s scriptural argument against the agitators in the Galatian churches. He has made the point that Abraham was justified before circumcision, rather than after. In fact, Abraham was right with God before the Law was given at all.

He now moves to a allegorical argument based on the two wives and two children of Abraham. This is one of the most difficult passages in all of the Pauline letters for several reasons. First, Paul uses a method which is not simply unfamiliar to us, it seems to be drawing things out of the text which are simply not there. If a modern pastor made this sort of an argument, most people would question them and probably reject the argument based on the use of allegory alone.

Second, the allegory itself seems strange to the modern reader since it is not a modern allegory at all (Aslan is Jesus, Pilgrim’s Progress, etc.). But that is not at all the sort of allegory Paul wants to find in the Sarah and Hagar story. Paul is creating a contrast between the two sons of Abraham, one who was born free, and the other who was born in slavery. The story in Genesis is not an allegory at all, Paul is drawing an allegorical contrast from it. As Ben Witherington points out, Paul is using allegory to contemporize a text, not find “deeper meanings” (Galatians, 330). In other words, this is more like an application, or an analogy in contemporary rhetoric rather than a full allegorization of the original story.

With those clarifications, what is the point of the allegory? These two covenants are contrasted as between the earthly Jerusalem and heavenly Jerusalem. This is obscure, but Paul’s point is to connect the old covenant (the Law) with Sinai, a location outside of the land, in Hagar’s territory, with the new covenant enacted in the “real” Jerusalem in Heaven.

The fact that Paul considers Jerusalem to be under the yoke of slavery is significant. He could be referring to the fact that it is still under Roman rule (the exile continues), but likely as not he is dismissing the earthly Jerusalem because the agitators make a great deal about their connection to the Jerusalem church.

What is surprising is that Hagar represents those who are enslaved by the Law, or Second Temple Period Judaism! Sarah is the free woman, therefore she represents those who are saved apart from the law. Going back to verse 19, Paul describes his ministry as “bearing free children” like Sarah, while the agitators are “bearing slave children” like Hagar. It is all that they are capable of since they are still under the yoke of the Law (Witherington, Galatians, 331).

The point of the analogy is made clear when we realize that Paul is taking on the role of Sarah and commanding that the agitators be expelled from the church! As strange as it sounds, Paul is speaking the words of Sarah to the congregations. The agitators must be removed because there is danger in letting them remain. Like Ishmael, they threaten the (spiritual) life of the true heirs of Abraham.

This seems strong by contemporary standards, but for Paul this is critical to the health of the church. The agitators are attacking what it means to be “in Christ” and therefore risk destroying the church. As he will say in 5:9-10, the bad yeast must be wholly removed and thrown away. Just a little legalism is enough to ruin the whole church!

One thought on “Galatians 4:21-5:1 – Sarah and Hagar

  1. This is really interesting to the fact that Paul showed his knowledge and understanding of the scripture to make an allegory like this. The thought of both women representing both sides of the being free and being a slave. What is also interesting from other classes I’ve learned that Ishmael, Hagar’s son, is an ancestor to Mohammed. This is fascinating seeing that Islam is similar to Christianity in a way that to me would just be basing it off of the beliefs of Christianity. Which Muslims now have control of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem which they consider is the second holiest site, below Mecca. It’s interesting that Paul choose the split where two of the major religions were born, Ishmael; Islam, and Isaac; Judaism and Christianity. But why this story of Abraham, Hagar and Sarah? Well at the end of Genesis 16 Hagar is not mentioned anymore. In Genesis 16:7-16 Sarah, Sarai at the time, mistreated Hagar because of her own guilt. This led Hagar to flee, and after meeting an angel who then told her that she will have numerous descendants is she ‘submitted’ to Sarah and went back. She did and was named Ishmael by Abraham. This is where Paul could be getting at. The Angel told her to submit to Sarah. From reading Galatians 4:28-31 Paul talks about, in your words from the blog, Hagar representing the “enslaved by the Law, or Second Temple Period Judaism”, and Sarah being “the free woman, therefore she represents those who are saved apart from the Law”. It’s fascinating that he also mentions Isaac to be the children of promise. Hagar was told Ishmael “will be a wild donkey of man;” and “will live in hostility toward all his brothers.” from Genesis 16:12. The fact that Islamic Muslims have the belief that they don’t turn away from a battle and that one of the greatest sins in Islam is shirk which is defined as to “avoid or neglect” which is talking about duty or others. I sincerely found this blog interesting and how it connects to modern history!

Leave a Reply