Hebrews 1 – Jesus and the Angels

The first section of Hebrews develops an argument that Jesus was foreshadowed by various people and events in the Hebrew Bible. In chapter 3 he will contrast Jesus and Moses, perhaps the most faithful servant of God and certainly the person associated most with the Law. It is well known that Matthew uses a kind of Moses typology in his Gospel to show that Jesus is a teacher in the tradition of Moses yet superior to him.

It is therefore somewhat surprising that the book of Hebrews does not begin with the contrast with Moses.  After the introduction, the writer says that the Son who is seated at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven is superior to the angels (1:3). Following this statement, the writer constructs a lengthy comparison of Jesus and the angels, drawing on a series of texts from the Hebrew Bible (1:4-14, 2:1-9). Why start with the angels?

Dore AngelsAngels were very popular in Jewish mythology from the second century B.C. through the first century A.D.  A whole hierarchy of angels was developed along with some theological teachings that were not present in the Old Testament.  In the re-telling of Biblical stories writers often had angels performing acts that were acts of God in the Hebrew Bible.  Although the imagery is found in Daniel 10, the appearance of angels as glowing white, fiery, glowing, etc. was developed during this time as well.

Angels were associated with giving of the Law to Israel in early Judaism.  This tradition develops from Deut 33:2, where the “holy ones” accompany the Lord as he arrives at Sinai. “Holy ones” was taken to mean angels. In Acts 7:53, Stephen refers to the Law as “delivered by angels.” The Second Temple book Jubilees predates Hebrews and begins with a reference to the “angel of the presence” who wrote a text for Moses:

And he said to the angel of the presence, “Write for Moses from the first creation until my sanctuary is built in their midst forever and ever. And the LORD will appear in the sight of all. And everyone will know that I am the God of Israel and the father of all the children of Jacob and king upon Mount Zion forever and ever. And Zion and Jerusalem will be holy.” (Wintermute, “Jubilees,” in OTP 2: 54)

The tradition that angels delivered the Law is found in later Judaism as well:  “The presence of angels at the event of the giving of the law was a favourite bit of embroidery in rabbinic tradition, and was meant to enhance the glory of Sinai” (H. Schoeps, Paul, 182).  The emphasis in this literature is on the angels as intermediaries, delivering the Law to Moses.  When God revealed himself to Moses, he used angels.

Since the writer of Hebrews began his book by saying that God is new revealing himself through his Jesus, it is possible a Jewish reader might think of Jesus as an angel, like a Michael or Gabriel.  He must therefore begin by showing that Jesus is something other than an angel; he is “Son of God.”

One last observation:  Is this a “difference” between Jewish Christian literature and the Pauline Letters? Perhaps not. While Paul cannot be accused of emphasizing angels, he does use the same sort of language as Stephen in Gal 3:19: The law was “put in place through angels” (ESV).

Are there other reasons that the writer begins with a sustained argument that Jesus is superior to the angels in every way?

29 thoughts on “Hebrews 1 – Jesus and the Angels

  1. The opening chapter of Hebrews is striking evidence that the earliest believers had a conception of Jesus unfamiliar to us. This deserves greater study.

    Like

    • I agree; a major roadblock is that the style of exegesis is not modern, western, grammatical-historical method. Honestly, if a student handed in a Greek exegesis paper with Hebrews 1 style interpretation, they would fail. We do not blend texts quite this way to make theological points the way a Jewish writer in the first century did. (And thanks for the correction!)

      Like

  2. I find that Hebrews has difficulty getting any real traction in our day, because we do not live in the same ‘enchanted’ world of its original audience. They almost deified angels. But we think of angels as a carry-over myth from a bygone era, a way of explaining the forces of nature which we now know to be governed by universal laws and not supernatural beings. So in exalting Jesus above angels, we immediately sense that we just don’t have that issue and so do not find ourselves being addressed by the text. So maybe the first step to a higher christology is to reinstate the doctrine of angels. (I think I remember hearing Neal Plantinga say a while back that preachers should be delivering about one sermon per year on angels.) Or maybe a preacher could help his/her hearers diagnose whether they believe, in essence, that Jesus is merely an angel.

    Like

  3. I find Jobes’ observation of the ancient world viewing humans as inferior to angels quite interesting (Jobes 93). Understanding this cultural belief and knowing Jesus lived as a human being would cause all the more reason for the Hebrew author to emphasize Jesus’ superiority – especially as the Son of God. The author must have been compelled to provide Jesus with a substantial and credible background before further developing the Hebrew writings.

    Like

  4. Many new Christians at the time may have mistakenly thought of Jesus Christ as an angel. Having the notion of God’s unity (Deut. 6:4, etc.) ingrained into their theological understanding, it may have been hard for them to accept Jesus Christ’s divinity. Maybe the author opens the letter this way in order to correct them. I think this understanding of Hebrews 1 would be a bit of meat for Jehovah’s Witnesses who claim that Jesus Christ is the archangel Michael.

    Like

  5. I agree with Sean, that they may have mistaken Jesus Christ as an angel. I also think that people may not have Jesus Christ as the Messiah that they were waiting/looking/hoping for, or even they thought him to be a prophet or simply a man after God’s own heart, like David was. The fact that the author of Hebrews defends this there was obviously more than one problem with who people thought Jesus Christ was, other wise it wouldn’t be in the scriptures. For all scripture is God-breathed. (2 Timothy 3:16)

    Like

  6. I think it is very important and significant that the author of Hebrews made a point to portray Jesus as superior to the angels. Like others have commented, it is understandable that early Christians and jewish people would think of Jesus as an angelic being. We know that in order for Jesus to have been our Savior, he had to have been both fully God and fully man, and not an angel. I think that this argument also helps to clear up our knowledge of angels. The subject of angels is a mysterious one, and we aren’t told much about them. But by this author stating that angels are messengers from God and different from humans, we can more clearly define what angels are and what they do.

    Like

  7. Read in the light of its ancient Jewish apocalyptic and mystical context, establishing the son’s identity in relation to the angels would have been a natural and necessary topic to address. As you note, angels were “very popular” around this time, but especially in Jewish apocalyptic and mystical traditions. Not only are angels virtually omnipresent in the ancient Jewish and Christian apocalypses, and often portrayed as highly exalted, but the relationship between the angels and someone who has ascended into their habitat is very much an apocalyptic/mystical question (e.g. Dan 12:3; 1 En. 14–16; 104:1–6; 2 En. 22:8–10; 2 Bar. 51:10; Ascen. Isa. 7–9). As a figure who has recently ascended into the heaven realm, the question of the son’s identity in relation to the angels would have been an obvious one to someone coming from this kind of environment, and need not suggest a polemic against angel veneration or an angel Christology (Barnard, Mysticism of Hebrews, pp. 157–70, 243–70).

    Like

    • Thank you for your valuable comments. I agree that there was angels were “virtually omnipresent in the ancient Jewish and Christian apocalypses,” the texts you cite more than show that. In some cases angelic beings have almost become semi-divine beings, I am thinking of Metron, but there are others. Obviously there is evidence to evaluate than a short post like this can handle; my point here is to point out that what seems odd to the western, 21st century reader would resonate with the Jewish reader of the first century.

      I have not had the chance to read your book yet, our local seminary libraries do not have it yet (although I should request it!)

      Like

      • My pleasure. I’m delighted to have come across these stimulating posts on Hebrews – thank you.

        Like

  8. I would suggest that the author of Hebrews argues that Jesus is superior to angels in every way at the beginning of the book because many of those reading Hebrews knew that Jesus was a man but they may not have realized he was even more superior than the angels. Hebrews was written with a very Jewish attitude about it and it was necessary to talk about just how superior Jesus was so that the readers knew how important He was as well. The believers of the time may have thought of Jesus in a number of ways and they needed to be reminded just how superior He was even to the great beings that they thought angels were.

    Like

  9. I find that Hebrews has any real relevance to our times today simply because we weren’t born in the same era as its original audience. As seen in Heb. 2:9 Jesus was made lower for a while so that he could be made fully human. He did so that he could restore us of our sins of the human race, he wanted to be made in human likeness. In Jobes book it clearly says that Jesus was an angel that did something that other angels couldn’t- he die as the sacrificial love for the atonement of our sins to humankind. (p. 99). Without the accession of Christ this atonement would be incomplete. I do think it’s important to note these things to fully understand the complexity of the religion and I think that Hebrews really adds to that emphasis.

    Like

  10. Any thoughts on Dr. Heiser’s “Unseen Realm” regarding this? His exploration of sons of God and the supernatural structure intrigues, me, just wondering if you have any comments about it.

    Like

  11. Interesting connection between Jesus and the angels. I never had made that connection before, that God used angels to reveal himself to the Jewish people and then Jesus was all of the sudden sent instead. It would make complete sense why the author of Hebrews would make a point to tell his audience that Jesus was different than the angles and that although his purpose was similar, Jesus was much much more significant. Maybe another reason was to tell that Jesus was even greater than what their preconceived notions of a messiah were. Instead of an angelic warrior from heaven like Michael, Jesus was even greater.

    Like

  12. I think it’s important that Jesus be contrasted from the Angels because, as we are told of his story, and throughout the New Testament, they are present authorities of God. They are his messengers, they send blessings, miracles. They are not part of God, but more of his creations. The angels were even the ones who, outside of prophecy, brought news of Jesus’ birth. In the appropriate times, they were mouthpieces for God. We can see some comparisons between the angels and Jesus, so the author of Hebrews makes a point to draw that line of contrast.

    Like

    • I think that you make a good point Rowan. If the Jewish people saw Jesus teaching and preaching along with performing miracles, they probably would mistake Him for an angel. I like how you said that the angels are not part of God, they are His messengers whereas Jesus was a part of God; He was and is God. Like you said we can see and make comparisons between the angels and Jesus Christ which is why, I too, can understand why the author of Hebrews would feel it necessary to draw a line of contrast between Him and the angels. I feel that in doing so the author may have been able to eliminate some confusion that the believers at the time (and even possibly today), may have had.

      Like

  13. I think that it is interesting how just as the Israelites thought a lot about angels and how a couple thousand years later Christians still have questions and think about them. I never thought that the Jewish people may have thought of Jesus as just another angel sent to share a message from God. If there was a possibility that the Jewish people would think that Jesus was an angel, then I think that the book of Hebrews is trying to make sure that the people know that Jesus was not just an angel; that He was the Son of God. As stated above, angels would deliver a message or the Law, but Jesus was sent to fulfill it. By explaining that Jesus, in His human form still had authority over the angels, I think was to help them understand that He still was God and had power and was holy.

    Like

  14. I believe the author of Hebrews began with angels because in the past the Bible portrays angels to be of such a high value. They are majestic and holy. Even today as Jobes mentions in our culture people love angels on cards or jewelry or anything. It’s a symbol of meaning to us. I believe that the writer of Hebrews was developing a way to make his point clear to his recipients. Christ our savior was not an angel. He was not a deliver of news, but eternal life. The distinction was needed to be clear because like Jobes says, “can you imagine angels worshiping a human being!” (49). This would seem to be wrong. However, Hebrews 1:1-4 clearly states that Jesus was much more than an angel. He was a representation of God’s being. He was not just a symbol of holiness or there to only bring news, He was sent by God to save us. I think the author of Hebrews was making it clear to the recipients before he continued his writing what Jesus did and trying to show in the best way possible the magnificence of Christ. By explaining the difference between angels and Jesus the writer was laying the groundwork for explaining the power and importance Jesus had.

    Like

  15. In Hebrews chapter 1 God reminds us that His son is superior and above all creation even the angels. This gives Jesus full reign both cosmos and earth and under earth. God made Jesus Christ his son, taking that sonship to another level such as Father-Son relationship. Not only the Son of God, but well the Son of Man giving Christ Jesus the legal status to fully accomplished God’s redemptive plan. God assign angels to continue to minister those that to inherit salvation, worship Jesus Christ. In my ESV footnotes angels are considered “sons of God,” but without the rights of the unique Son of God Jesus Christ. Moreover, it is not by the name of angels we can be saved, but it is the name of Christ Jesus that God has given him to be above all other names, a person can be saved. Giving us the understanding that only through Christ Jesus are we forgiven for our sins and given salvation for eternal life. Hebrews 1:4 says, “having become as mush superior to angels as the name he has inherited is more excellent than theirs.” I thought this verse, was very interested in seeing a level of authority and power and superior position.

    Like

  16. In Hebrews 1:2-3, states that God appoints Jesus the heir of all things. Like I stated in my previous blog post, this title of heir holds a lot of authority, especially within God’s kingdom. This title was only given to Jesus which means that in this title alone, he holds the supremacy above the angles. I think throughout Hebrews this title is becoming more apparent and the author makes an important shift by making note that Jesus is above all heavenly hosts. If we even look at what the author says after verses 2-3, we see that in verse 4 he mentions that “his name is more superior than the angels.” This refers back to the the title that Jesus had received, this title states that he is above all, and nobody is superior to him.

    Like

  17. Like the other blog post, Jesus was the heir or the firstborn to God. This makes Jesus over all the other angels. We like those angels will glorify and worship God and Jesus. One thing that we also have to remember is that there is no one that can take Jesus’ place on the throne. God created Jesus to be his one and only son and gave him up to die for all of us out of love and compassion. We will never be superior to Jesus nor will the angels ever be either. All we can do is praise Jesus and worship him for the heir and first-born son He is. If it wasn’t for Jesus, we wouldn’t even be considered sons of God. We have to remember that and keep this in mind when we think about this idea that if it wasn’t for Jesus, we wouldn’t be sons or daughters of God. This is what makes him heir and first born overall.

    Like

  18. To argue with you a little bit here, Hebrews 2:7 says, “you made him for a little while lower than angels…”. This sounds like Jesus made himself lower or inferior to angels while he was on earth. But after his resurrection he was crowned in glory. From this part of hebrews it sounds like angels are superior to Jesus.

    To answer your question there are other reasons that the writer begins with a sustained argument that Jesus is superior to the angels in every way. It is the fact that he died on the cross. Jobes says, ” The incarnate son did what no angel could ever do – he died” (Jobes Pg.94). He rose again and no angel could ever do that. therefore he is superior to angels. Also he is appointed the high priest also reigning over all everything. John 3:16 shows that Jesus was God’s one and only son so he would be above all the angels.

    Like

  19. The importance of angelology is extremely high in Jewish culture especially in first century A.D. I agree with your statement on that. It seems as though there was a growing pressure to explain things in a way that makes sense in a human mind. Angels were the comprehensible thing that helped glue these Jewish stories together. It also may have made these stories more enticing to listeners. However, another thing that might have caused this spike in the usage of angels would be the Neoplatonic dualistic influence in the culture at the time. Neoplatonic dualism would have helped provide a worldview where spiritual things were greater and purer than the things on earth. This idea helps provide an explanation as to why Jews would start to define and give detail to angelology. These angels would help glorify God, make these stories more holy, and also play into the culture of first-century Judaism. The author of Hebrews has been clearly influenced by Neoplatonic dualism. In multiple places throughout the book of Hebrews glimpses of Neoplatonic dualism perks up like in Hebrews 8:5 where the author refers to a “copy and shadow” of sacrifice or Hebrews 10:1 where the author talks about “true form”. This type of language can be directly pointed to Neoplatonic dualism. More evidence for this influence is found in the style of the book of Hebrews. It is well written, has ideas that are not found elsewhere in the Bible, and clearly shows the author’s profound rhetoric. He claims that he is not a witness to Jesus’ ministry (2:3). Therefore it is very possible for him to be a Hellenistic Jew who is well versed in rhetoric and knows a thing or two about Platonic philosophy. All that to say, the author emphasized Jesus advanced position over the angels first because the Jewish culture at the time had such a high view of angels (possibly due to platonic influence) that this would be the hardest argument to tackle. It needed to be addressed first.
    Whether this is a difference in Pauline literature or not is probably not a very important question. I would say it is a difference but not a major one. The audience, for the most part, seems Jewish, whereas in Pauline literature the audience seems both Jewish can Gentile but mostly Gentile. And honestly, the difference is of less importance to me because both authors write truth and that is what is necessary. Whether the topics are different or not, both authors give calls to action through what has been revealed to them. That is what is important.

    Like

  20. It is interesting to see how much of the author of Hebrews theology comes through in his comparison of Jesus to the angels. During his discussion of how Jesus is superior, he talks about how Jesus was made human. Humans were considered to be inferior to angels, and so to claim that Jesus was still superior seemed absurd (Long, 33). In reality, Jesus is made complete and superior through his life on earth as a man. Jesus came to the world to save it by sacrificing himself for the sake of all men. Because of his redemption of man, God elevated him and set him above everything, even the angels. Everything will one day be placed “under Jesus’ feet,” and he will rule, unlike the angels (Long, 40-41). It was necessary for Jesus to be a man in order for him to be exalted and placed at the right hand of the Father.
    This also shows Jesus superiority to other things, including death. Jesus took the form of man so that death would no longer have a hold over man. By dying and then rising again to life, he was able to overcome the power of death and show his power over something that no one can overcome. This again shows how he is greater than the angels because of his incarnation.

    Like

  21. It is very interesting that the author would start off addressing Jesus’ power in relation to angels. Back when this was originally written, the author probably had in mind that angles were held in very high regard. I believe this may partly due to the fact that angles flooded the Old Testament with stories of prophecy, visions, and more. Also, as someone mentioned above, the original targeted audience of this excerpt likely didn’t realize that Jesus, our Lord, was also fully man. They may have believed that since he was God, he could not have also been the son of God. They may have called him an angel for that reason. This goes to show that the author intentionally started with this because of his audiences lack of knowledge of the trinity and of Christ’s fully human deity,

    Like

  22. The popularity and frequency of angels within this timeframe surprises me. If angelology was as prominent among the New Testament readers as the blog states, why isn’t more common in literature?
    The blog post states that angels were, “very popular in Jewish mythology” from second century BC to first century AD. This makes it a critical piece of information for understanding the text within its historical context. Up until now, however, I’ve never heard of it.
    This makes me wonder what the rest of Jewish mythology was and how similar/different it is to the Old Testament Jewish traditions.The blog also mentions Daniel 10 and the descriptions of angels in that passage. Was this the spark that initiated the Jewish views of angelology?
    With this understanding, the argument the author of Hebrews makes holds well. Jesus is not an angel. But he is even higher than their most treasured figures in mythology.
    I enjoyed the blog post and agree with its premise.
    What I really want to know though, is how the virgin birth played into (or didn’t play into) Jewish mythology.

    Like

  23. I feel that understanding the cultural belief and knowing who Jesus is as we go through life is very important and is very key to life. The person who wrote Hebrews talks about how Jesus is the best of the best and how no one ever could surpassed him to be great.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.