Who is Epaphras? (Colossians 1:1-8)

“Without doubt…the least important church to which any epistle of Paul is addressed.” J. B. Lightfoot, Colossians, 16.

By the first century, the city of Colossae could only be described as a “small town” by Strabo, (Geography, 7.8.13.)  Little is known about the town in this period other than it was nearly destroyed by an earthquake in A.D. 60/61.   The cities of Laodicea and Hierapolis are quickly rebuilt; Laodicea can even be described as “rich” when the book of Revelation is written thirty years later.  Colossae probably never recovered from this disaster.

ColossiansThe church at Colossae was founded by Epaphras, a disciple of Paul from Ephesus (cf. 1:7, 4:12).  Epaphras is called a “faithful minister” (verse 7).  The name is short for Epaphroditus, a name common in the first century (c.f., Phil 2:25, 4:13, Philemon 23). An inscription was found in Colossae mentioning a T. Asinius Epaphroditus, although it is unlikely this is the biblical Epaphras (F. M. Gillman, 2:533).

Epaphras was from Colossae (4:12) and may be an evangelist in the Lycus valley. The cities of Laodicea and Hierapolis both had thriving churches in the first century (4:12, Rev 3:14-22).  Paul tells the church that Epaphras has reported their faith to Paul, and in 4:12 Paul describes himself as “wrestling in prayer” on behalf of the church while he is working hard in other churches.  The Colossian believers learned from Epaphras, who learned from Paul.

The verb μανθάνω is associated with “systematic instruction” rather than a brief outline (BDAG). Perhaps Paul used this verb in order to set the gospel preached by Epaphras apart from the Colossian heresy. Epaphras was disciple by Paul and trained to be an evangelist and church planter by the apostle Paul himself. The opponents do not appear to be associated with anyone in the apostolic circle and their teaching is not approved by Paul. In fact, the bulk of the letter engages the ideas of the opponents in order to show their teaching falls short of the Gospel.

Paul may associate himself with Epaphras in this letter because his opponents in Colossae are question his credentials–who is Epaphras to be teaching the congregation spiritual things?  The church may be influenced by other teachers for guidance rather than a young evangelist like Epaphras. Paul gives Epaphras has his personal approval in the opening of this letter, what Epaphras teaches is exactly what Paul taught.

This prayer also serves to underscore the authority of a local pastor-evangelist who was questioned by his church. Paul lets the church know from the first paragraph that he will be siding with Epaphras in any theological debates in the church!

8 thoughts on “Who is Epaphras? (Colossians 1:1-8)

  1. I can see why people would question Epaphras, this person they had never heard of before, and his authority to preach the gospel. Just because he was taught by Paul, that gives him the right to preach the gospel to the Colossians? Yes it did. Epaphras was actually the individual who seemed to introduce the Colossians to both Christ and Paul (TTP 222). Epaphras was a ‘dear fellow servant’ and a faithful minister of Christ’. This was depicted in Colossians, written by Paul, so why wouldn’t her talk highly of the individual that he taught? One reason they should trust Epaphras was because he was one of them in the sense that he was from Colossae. There is also thoughts the Epaphras was with Paul at the time of writing this letter (TTP 222). Epaphras was talking highly of the Colossians to Paul as well. “…who also told us of your love in the Spirit” (Colossians 1:8). He only wanted the best for the Colossians, just as Paul did. “For this reason, since the day WE heard about you, we have not stopped praying for you” (Colossians 1:9).

    Like

  2. Paul was vouching for Epaphras because of these questions regarding his legitimacy. According to Longenecker, Epaphras may be the reason that the Colossians heard the gospel (222). It appears that these other people were coming in and presenting differing views from Paul and Epaphras. The idea of questioning the material presented does not seem to be unheard of in the New Testament church. In acts the Bereans were considered noble because they not only heard the message of Paul, but studied the scriptures that Paul presented in order to determine whether or not Paul’s message was true (Acts 17:11). Perhaps the problem here is that the church is questioning Epaphras in light of new teachings from others. They are not questioning whether or not his words line up with the scriptures but instead considering others opinions. Paul needs to vouch for him in order to authenticate the message much in the same way a Christian may ask their pastor for an opinion regarding an author or another preacher. We must understand that they did not have the canon of scripture that we have today to test the various ideas. Paul would have been the one who could have authenticated a teaching as genuine. At the end of the book of Colossians Paul also authenticates the messages of Tychicus and Onesimus who he is sending to them (Col 4:7-9). Perhaps this was the letter of recommendation necessary for the acceptance of Epaphras’s message.

    Like

  3. Where did Paul and Ephesus meet up from the beginning?
    Ephesus name looks suspiciously as a name from Ephesians but you said that Ephesians from Colossians.

    Where was Ephesus born?

    Like

  4. Oops, correction on my part, please forgive me.
    Epaphras, is he from Ephesus, and where was his birthplace?
    Thank you for answering my question..

    B blessed

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.