After looking at a few example methods in the last few posts, I want to suggest four points that need to be part of a method for reading parables properly.
First, Parables are “extended metaphors” in which an abstract concept is made more clear through the telling of a story. A proper understanding of metaphor should not lead either to wild allegorizing nor a complete rejection of allegory as a way to convey truth. Elements of the parable may have a so-called “allegorical” meaning, but only insofar as the original audience could have understood. For example, that a king or master in a parable is intended to “stand for” God is a common enough stock feature in the Hebrew Bible and rabbinic parallels to accept this as the original intent of the parable. In fact, the imagery is so pervasive, it is hard to believe that anyone hearing the parables for the first time could have missed “king = God” as a metaphorical element. In order to develop this point, one would need to survey the rabbinic literature in order to develop a feel for these stock images. This would require a study to identify which elements of a given parable are likely to be “current metaphors” which would have had rhetorical impact on the original listeners.
Second, Parables were given in a specific context in the ministry of Jesus which can be recovered with some certainty. When a historical context is know it should be used to illuminate the parable. For example, the parable of the Two Debtors is found is a specific context in Luke 7:36-28 which is essential to the meaning of the brief parable. The “specific context” of a parable, however, may be generically stated and still be helpful for interpreting the parable. It is likely that the parables of the kingdom in Mark 4 / Matthew 13 were placed together via a tradition picked up by the authors of the gospels. But within the context of the overall ministry of Jesus, these parables were all spoken in Galilee, after some level of conflict with the Pharisees, and prior to the confession of Peter. Likewise, several parables of judgment are associated with Jesus’ teaching in the temple in his final week. This general Sitz im Leben Jesu seems give the parable enough context for proper interpretation. Parables therefore address a situation within the life and ministry of Jesus.
Third, Jesus taught in parables in order to communicate something to his original audience. While the single-point method of Jülicher avoids wild allegorizing, interpreters who attempt to create a single-point tend to boil the parable down to the most generic and bland message possible. Most of these “lessons” could be described as variations on the golden rule. For example, the Good Samaritan does teach us to love our neighbors, but this is something a Jewish audience would have already believed and practiced. However, if we really try to interpret the parable in the context of Jesus ministry the parable takes on a somewhat more radical dimension which has application to his present ministry at that moment in time. Interpreting the parable within the ministry of Jesus will aid our understanding of the point Jesus was making in the first place.
Fourth, since the stories were meant to communicate something to the original audience, we ought to look for the primary application of the parable to the ministry of Jesus. The best example of this is again the parable of The Two Debtors is found is a specific context in Luke 7:36-28. Within Jesus current ministry people are receiving forgiveness and responding in radical ways. The Parable of the Lost Sheep/Coin/Son refer to the same theme of forgiveness in the ministry of Jesus at that very moment. The parable of the Sower is a case where the meaning of the parable is better rooted in the events of Jesus’ ministry. The gist of the story is that a farmer went out to sow seed and some of this seed fell on unprepared soil while other seed fell on prepared soil. In the literary context of Mark and Matthew, the parable is a commentary on the first movement of Jesus’ ministry. He has come preaching the Kingdom of God. Some have accepted this message and followed Jesus while others have rejected the preaching for a variety of reasons. Each of the parables of the kingdom can be read as applying to what was happening in the Jesus-movement at the end of Jesus’ Galilean ministry.
Several “parables of judgment” occur in Jesus’ last teaching in the temple and are rather pointed condemnations of the existing power structure in Jerusalem and can again be interpreted as referring to Jesus’ ministry up to that moment in history. There is no need to think that the Parable of the Vineyard has been created by Christians after the resurrection, Jesus is describing what has already happened throughout his ministry. The parable of the Wedding Banquet can also be read as describing Jesus’ rejection by those who thought they were invited to the messianic feast and their replacement by those who had no chance of being invited.
Reblogged this on Talmidimblogging.
I really like your methods for interpreting parables, these methods were very clear and concise and definitely helped me understand exactly what a parable is. Your points about the parables being extended metaphors to make a concept more clear and Jesus using parables to communicate something to his audience I think those were great points. Strauss says “Jesus’ most important teaching device was the parable, using vivid and memorable scenes from everyday life to teach profound spiritual truths.” (Strauss, 538) I believe that is very true. I’ve heard a few parables to help me better understand a situation or the context of what’s happening. One parable that I remember and is always stuck with me from the very first time I heard is one that my pastor uses often when he talks about being faithful and knowing that God is always on time and will deliver. He talks about a woman who comes to church every Sunday and thanks God for blessing her with a car but every week she leaves church and catches the bus home, week after week it’s the same thing she thanks God for a car and gets on the bus so after a while people begin to ask her why is she thanking God for a car when she doesn’t have one. She responded she just thanks God in advance now because there was a time when she didn’t have food and she asked God ti blessed her with food and He did it she didn’t have clothes or a home and God blessed her with clothes and a home so she know when God is ready for her to have a car she will and she’s going to continue to thank him and advance for things He’s done. That just goes to show the faithfulness and belief she has in God because he’s already blessed her with so much and she knows He’ll do it again.
According to Strauss, “a parable may be defined as a story from daily life illustrating a moral or spiritual lesson” (p. 539, 2007). Growing up, I was taught about the parables told throughout the Bible and how they are significant to our life even now. However, the more I read about them in this class I realized that there is so much more to the parables then meets the eye. Although they are stories that allow us to learn moral and spiritual lessons nowadays like Strauss said, we have to take the context and audience in consideration. To us, these stories are generic and can be applied to multiple scenarios in our life, but if we look at what the culture was like during the time these were written we would realize that they were written for a specific reason. There were things going on during Jesus ministry that required addressing such as conflict with the Pharisees and the people needed to be taught through simple parables. In order to fully understand the individual parable, we need to dive into the study of the original audience and what was going on during that time. But just because they were written to a specific audience that does not mean they are not applicable today; we just need to be careful not to take them out of context.
When we read parables we cannot just read it and decide what it means based on our feelings. Parables are stories from Jesus to give instruction and show individuals a new perspective. Parables are meant for the original listeners and the meanings of the time period. We need to be aware of these current meanings and not just assume what words mean today, meant during this time. It is also important to know the surrounding context. Jesus was not random in the words he said and when He said them. Everything Jesus said and did was with intention, so when He shared a parable, it usually pertained and addressed a situation occurring in His life and ministry. Parables could all be based on love and success if we wanted them to, but when we look deeper and to why Jesus said them to the intended audience we find a deeper meaning. All of these parables are from Jesus and intended for His ministries and are applied to this. We cannot insert our own opinions to these parables because we want our preferences to be supported. Jesus spoke these parables to help others see the right way, to give them a better choice of how they choose to live their lives. When we read these parables we need to look at them for their true meaning. This comes as we study who the passage was for, Jesus’ reason for writing them, and the context of this time and the deeper meaning for individuals to act on. This is crucial as we study and grow in our understanding of Jesus’ life and ministry. It can be used to help our lives when used in the right context and meaning.
I enjoyed reading this blog post. what i gathered from it is that people should read the parables and look at the principles that come from them and look at Jesus exact moment in time. it is said parables had application to what was going on in Jesus ministry during that time. the parable about the good Samaritan is about a man traveling alone and gets robbed. a priest and a person of high religious faith sees this man who was robbed and beaten and discards him because the factors to not help outweighed helping this person. a good Samaritan takes this person and do the right thing any person of any status should morally do and that’s help and serve this person best way possible. this same element was going on in Jesus ministry at a larger scale, and essentially why he got executed. many high status people did not help or really care for each individual person only people who could benefit them or complimented them in some way. the people who walked by in the parable seen no value in the man laying down beaten in the street, so they felt it was not their problem so they did nothing.
Knowing that parables meant something specific to the biblical audience should be a huge indicator for us bible readers today. When we are confused at what a parable might mean, we should not guess and insert our own ideas or opinions. The original audience likely had a clear understanding of what Jesus parables meant and knew exactly what he was referring to. We should seek to understand the types of historical and literary context behind the original intent of the parables. Inserting ourselves into the original audiences shoes, retrieving the application and then applying it to our lives.
From what I read I really enjoy your blog post. I was able to translate each of the parables and have it be cleared to me that it is used in everyday life. I can honestly say from when I learned about parables before from when I see them now I can say that Jesus mindset and our mindset as humans have a lot in common an correlate and I also learned that a lot of his parables had meanings and they are true. The main point is Jesus wanted to get his point out to a real audience.
Thomas Hill
After reading this blog post I was able to understand the concept of what a parable was and looked like especially in the Bible. Parables where actually purposely used in many situations to compare or share ideas. Another reason or fact about parables that stuck with me is that “several parables of judgment occured in Jesus’s last teaching” (Phill Long). This had to be pretty important, Jesus said that the rejection of the people who where suppose to go or thought they were going to go to the feast ended up getting replaced by “Those who had no chance” (Phil Long). This was a question to me because why did these people have no chance? And if they had no chance how did they end up getting invited to the messianic feast?
It can be so easy to take the Bible out of context and apply it to our own lives in a way that we see fit. Sometimes these allegories we make are not all bad, we can probably come up with some allegories that make sense, however when we read scripture we should be trying to understand it in the way it was original meant to be understood. The danger with taking the Bible out of context and turning a parable into a personal life lesson is that we can miss some key elements and then misinterpret the Bible, completely missing God’s intended message. In all of Jesus’s parables there is a specific point, the way he gets to that point is through using cultural influences to explain that point to better illustrate the concept to his disciples. We need to know these cultural influences to fully understand the weight and meaning of the parable, and at that point you can start applying that point to your personal life.
This is a very helpful blog of interpreting the parables. Especially as “the church tend(s) to read the parables seeking to find theology that was well beyond the meaning of the parable” (P.Long, p.95). Which part of that is understanding the context and the culture during the Jesus’ time. It’s also quite interesting of the possibility of more meanings for a single parable that I wonder what would be the ‘right’ meaning for that parable? How would we better interpret that? Or does also Jesus meant more than one meaning for us to learn?
It’s also interesting from the parable of the messianic feast that those who were invited in are not, and those that weren’t invited were invited. I think that points toward those who think are saved and reject having to spend time with God, and those who might not have a chance of being invited get that chance to be invited to something big either that may be unbelievers/sinners or those who might have thought they sit too low of a place to be invited to something so grand.
But overall, very interesting and helpful post.
I found these four step processes for interpreting parables to be helpful and reiterate a lot of the ideas found in the “Four Portraits of Jesus” book. The main thing I took away from this post was the importance of context and understanding the parables as they were written, and not what we have defined them as. It is easy to water down these parables to essentially be cartoons, while in reality many of them are complicated and not as clear cut in meaning as we may think. While Jesus used parables to be metaphors in his teaching, they can be interpreted so differently now, and major details within the stories may be missed or misrepresented. This is why I think context is the most crucial detail when examining parables, as well as more broadly in other areas of life. How can we take words on a page without context and understand them as they were meant to be understood centuries ago? We can’t without context, and any attempt will be lacking in merit. As pointed out by P long in this post, the original context to these parables is still available for recovery. This means that we should use this context to our advantage to better understand the parables that Jesus spoke and prevent ourselves from misrepresenting them further.
One of my favorite things about parables is that they were used to connect and relate to the audience. Without understanding this and looking within the context of the original audience, one may be confused – as to why the story was written in the first place, and why 10 virgins waiting in the night was important to include within the Scriptures (Matthew 25:1-13). It is important to understand the original audience as well as the context it is in within Jesus ministry, as it brings revelation to the text. We are not the original audience – we are not in the shoes of the people Jesus was speaking to. While this is the case, there is a general application for each parable that can be applied to our lives – we just have to understand that. One could only wonder what type of metaphors, examples, and ideas that Jesus would take from our time on Earth to teach us lessons. The methods used within the blog post are very helpful to me. It is a good framework to understand and read the parables in a clear and
concise manner – and will definitely help me with my Parable Paper that is coming up! 🙂
When we were first given the list of parables to choose from, it was quite overwhelming. It is really easy to just go through and pick a random one, but once you read through them and take the time to understand them, you end up finding the right one. This blog post reminded me of “Bible Study Methods and Application” course at Grace. We learned how to interpret passages and the bible in a way that helps us understand. For example we have different versions of the bible. Some people use ESV, KJV, NIV, and others. Some are more clear and get straight to the point while others like KJV are a little more complex with wording. Long says “Parables are extended metaphors, in which an abstract concept is made more clear through the telling of a story.” These four steps to interpreting a parable are very helpful. My favorite step is the third. It talks about how Jesus taught in parables to communicate to his original audiences. The parable ends up helping us understand and dig deeper into the word. I agree with some of these other posts as well, it is important for us to not focus so much on what we think these parables mean. Jesus shows us in his word exactly what he means. We have to pay attention to the word and the context behind it.
I really like how this blog post focuses on the context and audience of the parable. I think this is so important for us to continue to look at. We see so many times today where quotes are taken out of context. One example that is almost slapping me in the face right now are all of the political ads I am seeing. These are a great example of where words and quotes are taken out of context, so it is hard to see what the speaker’s true intentions and beliefs are.
I also think that it is important to know the context of Jesus’ parables because these questions can easily come up when evangelizing. It is a logical question for a non-believer to ask, “why are you telling me this story? It has no application to today’s world, it is a story from Biblical times.”
Strauss tells us, “Throughout the history of the church, Jesus’ parables have been interpreted in a variety of ways” (Strauss, 399). We need to truly understand what Jesus was saying and the context of where and to who he was saying it so we can properly apply the parable today.
Today, people read something and automatically start making assumptions without thinking about its context. That is why you must be extra careful what you put on social media. Although you may mean something completely innocently, someone will take it out of context and use it against you. That is why the four steps that you mentioned are critical to correctly interpreting the parables.
In my opinion, the most important of these four would be how to interpret the parable in the context of Jesus’ ministry. Strauss would agree when he says, “the parables have become so familiar to Christians that we often miss the powerful impact they would have had on a first-century Jewish hearer” (p. 541). Jesus communicates parables to teach the original audience something, not us modern readers. Although all still hold meaning today, it is valuable to look through the lens of the original audience before we come to a conclusion that may be wrong!
It is dangerous to make assumptions/conclusions without looking at the full picture. We need to allow God to speak to us and reveal to us what He wants us to hear while reading the parables. Parables are fun to read but hold much more than just entertainment value. Although you do not have to do the “four” steps that you would for a parable, I feel it is good to double-check what you see on social media before telling everyone about what “him/her” said. It will only get worse, people will continue to make conclusions on their own, which means we will need God’s guidance even more.
Upon reading this blog post, one of the main take a ways for me that when we read the parables we should be looking at the setting that Jesus was in as well as what Jesus is saying. It is important to look at the ministry of Jesus at the time of said parable because it can give implications into what Jesus was conveying. It can also be a challenge when reading the parables today because of this situation. We must not read the parable and move on but rather dig deeper because there are underlying implications that we could have missed. We as readers must put ourselves into the original audience because they most likely had a great understanding for what was being said. “a story from daily life illustrating a more or spiritual lesson” (Strauss, p. 539). This is the definition from Strauss on what a parable is and it shows that we must be able to implement the original situation for our understanding. Once we do this we can grow in our ethical and social issues in a way that Jesus wanted us to do so.
One important thing to remember was the fourth point that was brought up. That the parables were delivered to and specifically taught to a certain group of people in a specific context based on maybe something they were dealing with or a specific question that were brought to Jesus. Strauss points out that a certain structure each parable tends to have is a character that resembles God and gives an examples that we are to learn from and to follow (Strauss, 2020). For example, the Good Samaritan, The Parable of the Laborers in the Vineyard and how the owner extended the same rewarded to all who came and worked regardless of when they came and began their work. Like mentioned in the post, it can be extremely easy for us to maybe be to quick to look out how the parable applies to our lives and how we can use it and learn from it. In order to get the most out of it though, and to get the most accurate interpretation, we are to look at who the original audience was that Jesus was speaking to, what it meant to that audience at that exact time, and then see what applications we can draw from it and how we can apply it to our Christian walk today.
This blog post is helpful for depicting any individual parable and finding the true meaning behind each one. Strauss uses this definition of a parable: “a story from daily life illustrating a moral or spiritual lesson.” Interpreting parables can be difficult at first, but this blog post helps with understanding how to read and interpret them with a four-point structure. The four-point structure first looks at the big picture, the context of the parable, where it is found within the Gospel and what Jesus has been doing in his ministry up until the parable was given. There is great repetition on this point because it is overwhelming the number of times you can read about it in the Gospels. The parable that I am studying personally is the parable of the ten virgins. In my research prior to writing anything on the parable, it is in the later part of Matthew, in the Olivet Discourse. This area of Matthew is all focused on the end times and the return of Jesus. Similarly, this is near the week where Jesus will be crucified. Strauss also points out that Galilee is where Jesus began preaching, and that his initial message of the coming Kingdom of God relates with his place in time of ministry. The parables can be applied to understand the specific portion of whatever is being read. I like how this post helps people of all understandings. Beginner Bible readers can see that parables are like a big metaphor that is aimed at conveying truth to those who are willing to seek the deeper understanding.
Understanding how to read parables is important, and the four points shared in the post offer a helpful way to do this. First, it’s key to see parables as “extended metaphors.” This means they use stories to explain deeper ideas. For example, when a king represents God, it helps us grasp the meaning without getting too caught up in overthinking it. Second, looking at the context of Jesus’ ministry makes a big difference. Each parable was meant for a specific audience and situation. Take the Parable of the Two Debtors: it’s about forgiveness but also reflects the social issues of that time. Third, we should be careful not to simplify the messages too much. The Good Samaritan teaches us to love our neighbors, but it challenges social norms that Jesus wanted to address. By seeing these stories within Jesus’ broader mission, we can find deeper meanings. Finally, it’s important to focus on what these parables meant for Jesus and his ministry. Parables like the Lost Sheep and the Sower highlight how people responded to Jesus’ message, showing both acceptance and rejection. In short, this method helps us better understand parables and invites us to engage more with Jesus’ teachings, making them relevant to our lives today.
Parables and their interpretation seem to come easily to me at this point in my career. That’s not to brag, or anything, its just something that has seemingly come easily to me over the years, but required a lot of practice and correction in order to get right. However, I seem to be facing a new challenge when it comes to parable interpretation, and that is this: how do we teach good interpretation without force feeding our listeners?
I’m interning at my church in my youth group, and one of the things that I am all about helping students know how to better understand their bible and how to apply it to their lives. one of the hardest problems that I have come across is teaching kids how to interoperate parables correctly. Its not that I can’t teach them, it’s just that I don’t know how to do it without giving them the answer. This blog post has really given me some good points to keep in mind when I am teaching kids how to interpret well.
After reading this blog post, I found your explanation of a method on how to interpret the parables of Jesus to be very interesting starting with your first point which is to look at it as an extended metaphor because of the allegory that can be found in these parables, and how the stories would be understood by the Jews of the time. I find this interesting because in Strauss, he talks about how Jesus talks in a poetic sense that would have allowed the people of this time to use what they knew in the world and apply it to what the lessons that he wanted them to know about the kingdom (Strauss, 2020). Another thing that I found interesting in the method that you speak of is to understand the parables you must understand the original audience. I agree with this because it is good to know the basic message that his parables teach, but it is also important I believe that understanding the audience of the time will give the reader of these parables a good example of why the message of the story was needed which will allow us to reflect on situations that could be similar to why the original audience needed it. Furthermore, this is what I found interesting from this post, and my perspective of what I thought of your ideas about this method of interpreting the parables.
I really enjoyed this post, I liked how it was able to break down four easy ways to better interpret the parables that Jesus taught, as many times I feel like people do not fully understand the meaning of them in the first place, much less how to actually interpret them. Being Christians it is our job to interpret God’s word to the best of our ability, and these were some great steps to take, in helping to come up with proper interpretations of these parables. One thing that stood out to me while reading Strauss this week was why Jesus chose to speak in parables in the first place. It states “The secret of the kingdom of God has been given to you. But to those on the outside everything is said in parables so that, “‘they may be ever seeing but never perceiving, and ever hearing but never understanding; otherwise they might turn and be forgiven (Strauss)!’” It was interesting to think that Jesus spoke in parables, because he actually did not want some people to know what he was saying, he used parables both to reveal, and conceal his messages to the people he was talking to. “Jesus spoke in parables both to reveal and to conceal To those responsive to his kingdom message, the parables illuminate the meaning of the kingdom. But to those who because of their hard-heartedness reject the message, the parables hide the truth (Strauss).”
These are all really great methods for interpreting the parables. Most people in the modern world interpret the Bible with their own feelings and through their own viewpoint, and it is just not possible to properly understand it that way. I have never really studied any of the parables in great detail, but this gives me a good place to start looking into more of them. They are similar to the principles of interpretation that Strauss gives in his book, “Four Portraits, One Jesus” .He also says that parables have a way of both revealing the Kingdom of God and concealing it, which can contribute to their sometimes confusing nature. In both of them, one of the most important things to consider in interpreting these mysterious short stories is context. In order to properly understand a parable, it is crucial to understand the context of Jesus, his ministry, and the parable itself. Unless we can understand the situation and circumstances of the story, it will e a lot harder to truly understand the parable and what it means. It is also important to keep in mind the central message of proclaiming the Kingdom. Like the post says, Jesus was using these parables in order to communicate something to the audience, and the goal should be to get as close to that primary application as possible. It is really easy to take the Bible out of context and completely miss the intended message. In order to get a better understanding of what the intended message of the parable or any Bible story is, it is important to understand these cultural influences. Once that is done, we can have a more accurate application for our own lives.
I really loved how clear and concise this post was. It made it very clear how we should read these parables. I love that you split it up into four different points. I love that you pointed out the fact that Jesus taught these parables to His original audience. I feel like we often try to apply everything to our context today, and forget to first look at the historical context that the parables were originally taught in. Not everything is universal, but of course there are still good messages we can retain from the parables, although we need to first understand it was not written to us, it was written to the original audience. Strauss makes it very clear that we cannot allegorize every parable. “For example, the parable of the good Samaritan is not an allegory of the history of salvation. It rather makes just one point: what it means to be a neighbor” (Strauss, 2020). This is my parable that I am going to write my research paper about. In my last article that I read and discussed in my paper it discussed how allegorizing the parable of the Good Samaritan to the history of salvation is not acceptable. We cannot take every single thing that is stated and allegorize it. Of course, there are many other parables that also cannot be allegorized. I also love that you mentioned every single parable was written in a specific context and to communicate to his original audience. We need to look at that context first, and then see if we can biblically apply it to our lives in an appropriate way. I really enjoyed reading this post and learning more about how to properly read the parables.
Interpreting parables is something that for me is either super easy to where you can see where the story is going before it is even finished or they can super confusing and will have you sitting there wondering what the heck they are even talking about. This post will definitely be something that I will use going forward to help get the most out of them for myself and also being able to use what I have learned from them to help those around me grow in the faith.
I like how you implemented these points when trying to understand parables. You implemented 4 out of the 6 keys to interpreting parables. Strauss’s first point is to interpret the parable from the context of Jesus’ ministry. He gives the example of the good samaritan. He states this story would have shocked the Jewish people of that day. They would have thought it to be inconceivable that a Samaritan would help out an Israelite. In modern society the thought of hating someone to this extent is hard to grasp. This story is equivalent to the racial tension between whites and blacks from the past. Since the stories were meant to communicate something to the original audience, we ought to look for the primary application of the parable to the ministry of Jesus (P Long). This is very important to understand the stories from there proper context.
These four points are great tools to use when interpreting parables. For me, the awareness that we must view the parable through the lens of Jesus’ original audience and consider its context within His ministry has helped me avoid misinterpreting or over-allegorizing the text. Many of the parables are familiar to modern Christians, and sometimes we miss what they meant to the original audience. Strauss said, “The parables have become so familiar to Christians that we often miss the powerful impact they would have had on a first-century Jewish hearer.”
For example, I always thought the parable of the Midnight Friend (Luke 11:5-8) was about being persistent in prayer. While the idea of persistent prayer is biblical, the parable of the midnight friend is not actually about that. After studying it carefully, I realized that the parable is not about persistence in prayer. Instead, it illustrates how the disciples can confidently bring their petitions to God, because God is their Father who cares for His children and graciously provides for their needs.
A friend refusing to respond to another friend’s request—especially when it involves helping to serve a guest arriving at midnight—would have been unimaginable for Jesus’ first-century audience, as hospitality was a deeply ingrained cultural value. By telling this parable, Jesus emphasizes that if a human would help a friend, even at midnight, how much more will God, the loving and gracious Father, hear their requests and respond to their needs?