The Seven Churches of Revelation 2-3

The second and third chapters of Revelation contain the letters to the seven churches.  These letters are probably the most familiar chapters in Revelation since they are the most easily applied to the modern church, and can be “preached” without difficulties found in the rest of Revelation. You can go on tours of the seven churches and there are innumerable charts and graphs on the internet that claim to properly interpret the “real meaning of the seven churches.”

Since Revelation is a book of prophecy, it was once thought the seven letters were prophetic of the entire scope of church history from the beginnings of the Apostolic Church (Ephesus) through the apostasy of the last days (Laodicea).  They may be letters to real churches but there is a “deeper” meaning to these letters which unveils the history of the church.  Naturally these interpreters see themselves living in the final period. The church of the “last days” will be like the lukewarm Laodicean church. For example, Jesus is outside the church knocking on the door, asking to come into the church, implying Jesus is not a part of the “present day church.”

Larkin Seven ChurchesInterpreters who approached the book of Revelation with the historical method spent a great deal of effort trying to determine which “eras” of church history are present in each of the seven churches. This was popular at one time even among Dispensationalists who otherwise avoided allegorical interpretations. John Walvoord, for example, sees this approach as shedding “much additional light” on the study of the seven churches (Revelation, 52-53).

I disagree with these schemes since they obscure the most important theological teaching of Revelation 2-3. These letters were written to real churches and are intended to be real communications with those churches.  The letters are a literary device used by John to communicate certain teachings to the entire church.  They are addressed to real churches with real problems, but they are intended to be read by the whole church. An analogy to the book of Amos is often made, since Amos begins with prophecies against 7 nations, ending with Israel and Judah.  Just as those prophecies would not have been delivered  separately than the rest of the epistle, the letters in Revelation would not have been intended to circulate separately from Revelation.  In fact, David Aune suggests that these letters may never have circulated at all (Revelation, 1:119).


It is far better to read these churches in the context Asia Minor in the late first century. Each letter contains allusions to the culture and location of the city addressed. Using the example above, Laodicea is did not have a good water supply. Unlike other cities nearby, they did not have therapeutic hot springs nor a fresh water spring. Hot water or cold water are both positive, helpful resources. Laodicea had tepid water that was not useful for very much at all. This explains the use of lukewarm in Rev 3:16. In 3:17 the Laodicean church thinks they are prosperous, but they are really wretched, poor, blind and naked. Laodicea was known for both eye-medicine and a textile industry. This is irony based on the culture of the city of Laodicea.

Other metaphors are more obscure (Satan’s throne, Rev 2:13 or the synagogue of Satan in 3:9 are particularly difficult). But the solution is not to be found in the history of the church or some allegorical teaching pulled out of the text without any knowledge of the social world of the first century.

Why do some people not take this history, geography and social setting into consideration when they read Revelation? The main reason is because it is hard work! It takes some effort to be fully aware of the history of these seven cities, most preachers do not have the time to do the additional reading to become aware of the background. This is unfortunate, because the message of the seven churches is even more applicable to the modern church when read against the background of a Greco-Roman Asia Minor of the first century.

24 thoughts on “The Seven Churches of Revelation 2-3

  1. I think you’re onto a good point about taking Rev. so symbolically, including the 7 churches section. In the 30 years I was an Evangelical (counting from age 15, when I began paying particular attention) I heard literally thousands of sermons, Bible teachings (radio, books, etc.) and such… a good # of them on Rev. and the 7 churches. Never did I hear (that I recall) any of the cultural/geographical features you mention. The ease of falling to what a preacher/teacher had been taught was probably a good part, related to your comment. And it’s so tempting for pastors to fall to use of passages to illustrate whatever (often helpful) psychological/spiritual points they want to get across.

    IMHO a major drawback of both conserv. and liberal churches is the pretense that they are helping form students of the Bible when both “ends” of the spectrum (and most in-between as well) seldom do it much. In reality, they very seldom teach either the content, interpreted carefully by genre, context, etc., nor do they teach HOW lay people can and should do it for themselves… or what to read, etc. And I’m not into biblical knowledge for its own sake, but one cannot well understand much about Christian faith or history, or Western hist/civ., or American political/religious foundations without understanding it and at least a bit of the history of its interpretation and application.

    In other words, one is not a well-informed CITIZEN, let alone Christian, without a decent grasp of fundamentals of the Bible and how it has been used over the centuries. Sorry… bit of a tangent, but hopefully relevant.

    • Thanks, Howard. I think that the tide has turned on this particularly allegorizing of Revelation, although I have met a few pastors and laymen that remained convinced that the historical scheme is right (or worse, that they are only *future* churches in the tribulation period!) Colin Hemer has an excellent book on the Seven Churches giving copious details on each location. Most people are still relying on Ramsay’s book on the seven churches, but Hemer is really a joy to read.

  2. I think that Walvoord’s discussion is a bit more nuanced than your brief quote would seem to suggest. It appears to me that Walvoord is not so much suggesting that each church represents a specific period of history but that as a whole the churches picture history as moving in a negative direction. So it is not so much that Walvoord “sees this approach as shedding ‘much additional light’ on the study of the seven churches,” but rather that the seven churches shed light on this trajectory which he also sees in other Scriptures. If you read Walvoord’s commentary proper in which he deals with the individual texts, he actually does deal with these churches in their historical and geographical context. I might add by the way, that Walvoord like a number of dispensational interpreters see 1:19 as providing an outline for the book which usually results in the following schema (see pp. 47-49):

    1. The things that were = chapter 1
    2. The things that are (John’s day) = chapter 2-3
    3. The things which shall be thereafter (future to John) = chapters 4-22

    In this representation, the seven churches belong primarily to John’s present not future.

    • Thanks for the clarification, Charles. But as I read page 52 of his commentary, he considers them “scriptural illustrations” and says “it would seem almost incredible that such a progression be pure accident, and the order of the messages to the churches seems to be divinely selected to give prophetically the main movement of church history.” He does try to nuance this in the following paragraph, saying it “should not be pressed beyond bounds” and that the view is in keeping with a futurist view of Revelation. All he is arguing for here is a general trend from an early, purer church to a latter-day apostate church.

      In the following page he certainly does not press for a historical interpretation often, however on page 69 he draws a parallel between Pergamos and Constantine; page 75 he connects the eating of food sacrificed to idols in 2:20-23 to the development of Catholic doctrine in the middle ages; page 83 the church of Sardis is a “prophetic foreshadowing” of the Protestant Reformation; Rev 3:10-11 has the Rapture in view (p. 87). It is certainly not what drives his interpretation, but he does drop in a hint at the older view in a few paragraphs.

      However, in the later Bible Knowledge Commentary, Walvoord says “There are some remarkable similarities in comparing these letters to the seven churches to the movement of church history since the beginning of the apostolic church. For instance, Ephesus seems to characterize the apostolic church as a whole, and Smyrna seems to depict the church in its early persecutions. However, the Scriptures do not expressly authorize this interpretation, and it should be applied only where it fits naturally. After all, these churches all existed simultaneously in the first century.” That is a bit more judicious than the 1966 commentary.

      It was E. W. Bullinger applied the letters of the seven churches only to the end times, with no application in either the first century or the history of the church,
      The Apocalypse, 68. I run into that from time to time among dispensational Bible teachers in my own denomination.

      The three-part timing is a common way to treat the time references in the book, it does emphasize the “nowness” of the churches. I think chapters 4-5 could be included there as well, although they are more or less timeless (from ascension to beginning of the judgments to come). I have also toyed with the seals as parallel to the Olivet Discourse, and therefore John’s way of presenting the “birth pains” before the actual tribulation.

      • On Rev 1:19: It is not a three-fold division. As Robert Mounce describes in his NICNT commentary on Revelation, it is a main phrase (“write what you have seen”) with two dependent clauses describing what John saw (“things which are” and “things which are to come”). That is a better description of the contents of Revelation: a mix of exhortation for the present (which applies to all) and a glimpse of God’s triumphant future to encourage those who must endure and overcome until that time.

  3. I would affirm with Phillip, the value of Hemer’s work. This is a must have resource for studying the seven churches.

  4. One of the reasons it’s easy to try and make the letters to the seven churches into representations of something else is because the whole of Revelation is filled with symbolic imagery, which can be confusing at times. These letters fall right into a mix of metaphors and allusion, so I can see how they could be taken as figurative. But P. Long, you brought up a good point that these letters addressed issues and used illustrations that can be linked to 1st century events and facts. This strengthens the argument that the churches were in fact real churches.

  5. I agree with having the historical background be more important than it has been when it comes to interpreting Revelation 2-3. Like you mention in the post here about Laodicea, there is a lot of value in the history and culture of the city. I remember preparing a lesson on that passage when I was in high school and being shocked to find out it meant something completely different that I thought it would. It makes me wonder how much history we don’t know that would change the way interpret passages.
    “I know your works. You have the reputation of being alive, but you are dead” (Rev. 3:1). Even a verse like Rev. 3:1 could be referencing something specific that a reader today may not catch. The city of Sardis was known for its reputation and having a big name as it was a very wealthy city. So this reputation that they were trying to uphold could very well have been related to that pride.
    And I also agree with the laziness part of not looking up the historical background. Preachers like theology and verses infused with emotion. But history can be dry and full of facts, which will come across as boring to many people. But in passages such as these, the historical background should be a part of the process of interpreting what the author originally meant.

  6. I agree with Jon, I think that the reason why people see the churches as representing something else, is because Revelation holds so much imagery. However, because most of the books of New Testament were written as letters to churches, to help guide then in their daily walk with Christ. To remind them of His love for them. And to teach them how to live. Also the fact that a lot of facts from Rev. 2-3 can line up with the first century, about when this letter was written.


    Before we speak on Revelation The great warning to the churches of our nations
    Through God’s eyes I will speak It BOLDLY no hesitation
    This is MY spiritual evaluation
    A spirit filled interpretation

    Before we start with the 7 churches and the key to their salvation
    We MUST first address the church today PLEASE!

    There are millions who love Jesus but have suffered indignation
    By the hand of those in churches
    Now to me
    That’s an abomination!
    In the past few years on my journey in determination
    To draw closer to the Lord Because Jesus IS my adoration.

    I have witnessed many a congregation
    And so much discrimination Severe spiritual abuse
    And degradation
    Money manipulation
    And fellowship termination Infair and unjust accusations When I try to share my jubilation
    Of the Lord Jesus of Nazareth
    MY first love.

    From the highest of administration
    The most apaulling insinuations
    I have seen churches of mystifications
    Congregation exploitations Cliques and isolation
    Profound demonstrations
    Of itchy ears-gossip-lying tongues
    A twisted evaporation
    Of the Lord’s Holy words Into SHEER FABRICATIONS!

    The very utilization
    Of FALSE doctrine
    And misinformation
    A crumbling foundation
    And complete utter stagnation Which has nothing to do with Jesus Christ
    Yet it is sold off to “His” Creation Our “dying” population
    Who desperately needs
    The Lord’s destination
    The churches are leading them To Satan’s annihilation!

    Can you feel my great frustration?

    Love!!! There should be NO contemplation
    That causes NONE humiliation Jesus loves ALL
    no matter what their situation No such thing as ‘denomination’ When you are following the TRUE God… Jesus of Nazareth.

    Now John had a vision
    And it was NOT his imagination For when the Lord appeared to me-He was a ‘Box office hit’
    An overnight sensation!
    In my heart-such a celebration Jesus is my sole infatuation REGARDLESS OF SPECULATION which I KNOW comes from satan I call it “Demonization”
    HE KNOWS MY HEART and that is MY affirmation!

    He shows me visions of great devastation Earthquakes-Tsunami-tornadoes-war in this nation
    NOT for trepidation
    Visions of this spiritual war Just one more confirmation
    He whispers “Go and tell the people of my amazing miracles and revelations”
    But the churches will not hear me
    And they take my testimony of great elation
    Once again Over and over
    More slaughter
    And hateful condemnation Aggravation
    Great frustrations
    The Devil’s altercation
    The churches revocation
    Of TRUTH
    To be speaking the TRUTH in GOD’S house
    To GOD’S people
    I receive Character assassination self annointed no passion-no fire Self idolization
    Who think it is THEIR invitation To scoff and spit
    On foreordination
    Such haughty Self rightious implications.

    I am so happy he will be returning And give me a permanent Vacation
    I will rejoice in adoration
    This suffering be removed Just peace…love… Complete saturation
    From all of this complication When all I want to do is tell People my testimony
    And my great jubilation Of Jesus of Nazareth My first love!

    A modern day Esther
    Who hides her designation Comfort under his wing
    With such high expectations
    She waits for HIM to reveal and steal the limelight
    In one amazing salutation
    She walks the dark valley and waits-he makes no mistakes What a very strange situation
    He started it-he will finish it Jesus of Nazareth is my Inspiration
    HE does it ALL beyond my expectations
    He has no limitations
    I need no elabotations
    So i wait faithfully
    In heavenly anticipation.

    Yes! Yes! I know the implications The so-called Holy and their Self rightious provocation

    “Who are you JoA to speak of the Lord? You are surely no saint… You are unholy-unlearned–It is the devil’s mesmerization
    “YOUR insubordination” Hallucinations
    Of my false indoctrination
    They take my beautiful testimony of Jesus the Lamb of God
    Evil connotations
    Spiritual casteration
    Ultimate expulsion Extermination
    From HIS Church.

    But Jesus is STILL my first love Regardless of Fiery darts
    And their lying declarations
    He gives me amazing lessons And he is revealing “revelation”

    Yes! Yes! I am aware of the significations
    Acts of reparations
    The FAILING churches of old
    The FAILING churches of now Where is the Lord’s High and HOLY EXULTATION?

    What I see is a GREAT Accumulation
    Of Satan’s penetration
    Divide and conquer
    Evil fruits of Nicolas
    Seeped with Pagan connotations When the churches don’t keep JESUS OF NAZARETH as their first love.

    The worlds downfall
    Utter Disintegration
    Demonic facination
    Has caused a great separation
    Of the Lord’s TRUE words
    Into subtle mutilation
    A very deathly combination

    The war is coming
    He calls it GREAT TRIBULATION this EVIL vibration
    Will sweep and swarm EVERY nation

    And no trepidation
    With HIS DIVINE WORDS Condemning SIN And repentance
    With no Improvisation!!

    The churches of this nation
    Have made many modifications They give no explanations
    A seat and pocket filled
    Is their true valuation

    They have betrayed the Lord Jesus
    DENYING HIS DIVINATION worried about themselves
    Their “about me” Reputations

    Simple explanation

    The Holy Bible
    Its words
    Its very desecration
    Has caused this Great separation Between the church And its first love…


    MY first love.

    • Dear Jooa77,
      I have purchased one of your booklets and thank you for your courage in tackling a very unpleasant subject. I know of someone who has experienced a couple of unpleasant attacks from evil. Unfortunately he is so confused and ashamed and believes the lies taught by his church that he must have some evil lurking in him – and consequently was shunned and driven out. This man has spent some years living like a hermit, totally lacking confidence and unable to move forward in life. One day those destroyers will have to face the music, and what a day that will be.

      Meantime, I am interested in following your comments but am not able to access your system, though I had put in a request some time ago for access, but there was no response.

      (Please do not publish my email address)

  8. P. Long’s post on Revelation 2-3 on the seven Churches in Revelation is extremely beneficial in understanding the most well-known chapters in the book of Revelation. P. Long’s mention of how merely because of Revelation’s reputation of being prophecy, people used to assume the same for Revelation 2-3.

    P. Long’s continue onward writing on how to better read the book of Revelation with all its context, history, and culture rather than assume it is prophecy. He further asks the question of why some people do not take into consideration the context, history, cultural context of Revelation. There are a multitude of different reasons for why some people do not take these factors into consideration when reading Revelation. One reason may merely be lack of resources to understand or look up the context, culture, and history behind Revelation. Another reason may be pure laziness that people do not desire to dig deeper into Scripture, and though a sad reality, may be very true among younger Christians.

  9. Delving into the actual, contextual history of just one of the seven churches of Revelation certainly did take some hard work. However, I believe it was really rewarding to uncover some of the reasons why John of Patmos used the different descriptors and metaphors that he chose in his letters to the churches. For example, Pergamum is the place “where Satan’s throne is” (Revelation 2:13), most likely due to Pergamum’s status as an imperial cult center. If nothing else, it definitely puts the persecution of that church into perspective, and the whole passage of the seven churches gives insight into how the early church lived under the rule of Rome. I agree that these are very teachable passages in the grand scheme or Revelation, as different churches each achieved their own successes and had their own missteps (there are a few different exceptions to this), each of which is something that the church can learn from. While I disagree with the more figurative interpretations of the seven churches, I can see why some people may think that they hold merit. After all, if Laodicea is supposed to stand for a lukewarm, present-day church, that isn’t so far off from how the church is portrayed in the modern day.

  10. Actually, this particular article illuminates the challenge I had when composing my last essay. The assignment was to choose one of the churches in Revelation 2-3, and then consequently do as much research about that particular place as possible–then of course explain your findings. What I found was quite astounding, and not only did it help me to have a better understanding of the history of the church I was researching, but it also illuminated the meaning of the text. This is what preachers are sometimes missing in their sermons, namely, the meaning behind the text. It is tempting, I understand, to neglect this part of the research and simply move on to the application stage, but without a contextual understanding of the church, many are misguided about what they are supposed to apply to their lives. For the essay I composed, I wrote about the Church of Ephesus, and in my research about this church, I discovered that the culture was quite pagan. It was the newly converted Christian’s reaction to this avid paganism that caused them to focus too heavily on doctrine as opposed to the love of Christ (Revelation 2:1-7). But without this knowledge about the culture, I would never been able to make sense of the letter. Thus, is it absolutely mandatory–especially when reading Revelation–that we grasp the culture and context before deducing meaning.

  11. We have talked about before in previous blog posts that figuring out the historical context in order to understand the current passage is so important and necessary. We cant just read and skip right to the application stage and figure out how it applies to our lives, although that would be easier, but we need to figure out the setting, history, and context to truly understand what is being said in these letters. But as mentioned in the original post, all of this takes a lot of time and energy which is why a lot of people don’t do it, including pastors.
    However, when we take all of this into consideration we will realize that these two chapters have a lot to say about our present life. It may be written to the single church but it is written for the whole church of Christ to read as well. We may not be able to relate fully to each and every letter written, but there is a lot that we can see directly in our lives and we need to change them and live differently. These letters were written in a historical time but they are there for us to learn from and reflect on.

  12. “These letters were written to real churches and are intended to be real communications with those churches”. I completely agree with what you stated. I also believe that these letters were sent to real churches. Each of the letters had a meaning and it was to communicate to each church and allow each church to know what it was lacking. We know that most of the churches were not doing what God commanded them to do, therefore, the best way to communicate to the churches was by a letter sent by God Himself. The vast majority of these churches were doing the contrary of what God wanted them to do. Each of the messages that God sent to each of the churches had a very significant purpose. The message to two churches was to congratulate them and keep being strong, while the message for the others churches was to repent, otherwise they would see God’s fury. To most churches God was very critical and this is because the churches had turned their back on God and were sinning, and even practiced idolatry. With this in mind, I completely believe that each letter was sent to a real church.

  13. There will always be the debate whether or not Revelation is historic, apocalyptic, or futuristic. I believe it is a combination of all three. I believe that these two passages are both historic and prophetic. In these passages, John reflects on the churches’ current situation and then gives each of them their own prophecy. I agree with Professor Long that these letters were circulated among the churches so that they could learn more about what God was telling the believers. I also agree that Revelation should be read in context of the time period that Revelation was written. Each of the churches had a distinctive trait that John pointed out. These traits could be good or bad. For the church of Laodicea, they were known for being lukewarm. Not the best complement. The believers thought that they were thriving in their faith when in reality they were just struggling in their faith. Hence, that was why John used metaphors that each church would understand. The church of Laodicea had waters that were lukewarm hence they understand what it meant to be lukewarm. Some of the metaphors may seem to be really weird, but they each meant something to each of the churches. In conclusion, it is better to understand the context of Scripture than focus on what kind of literature Revelation is.

  14. I find it humorous that history and context is not taken into consideration while teaching. Not that I have taught on it or attempted to look at the history thus far. This, however, is one of the first things we are taught as Bible students. I understand the time factor and the dedication needed to understand the context with accuracy, but it does not change the significance and impact it can make on the teaching. The seven churches are very common teaching, specifically the lukewarm metaphor. Every time I hear this I think about the movie, War Room, where the elderly lady makes coffee and serves it to the younger main character. She immediately spits it out and it does not taste good. I know this first hand as a coffee lover. It is intriguing to read the letters to the church and think about it in present-day mindsets. History is made and written down to help those in the future with the hope of not repeating mistakes. The best way to move forward from history is to understand the situation and the core of the culture at the time, to be able to see the way problems evolved for better or worse. Regardless of the content, the context of the history, geography, and setting needs to be taken into consideration to be studied deeper, despite the added energy and time it requires, which is easier said than done.

  15. We are lazy and like to take things out of context all the time. As P Long said, there is so much information and effort needed to be put in that many preachers don’t have enough time for all the background or don’t have the resources. But this is extremely important in understanding the symbolisms and metaphors. Revelations 2-3 about the seven churches is very important for us today, we can understand that this letter is written to the body of Christ, the church today. Though not all is applicable we can make sure we are not a lukewarm church. Active and fervent for God in all we do every day of the week. If we don’t understand the background and context of Laodicea then we would be making up our own interpretation.

  16. There was an assignment that I had to choose one of the churches in Revelation 2-3, which in fact I did some research about one of the places to explain the findings and how it all started. I understand the history from what I have researched about the places and the church. Preachers will sometimes miss what they are missing in their sermons, what is behind the meaning of the text and where it began. If the preachers will not explain about the churches or any events that happened probably give at least a little bit of details. People should do this in their Bible study to break down points in the Bible to understand the story. Believers will read the Revelation by themselves to try to understand it and at the same time they will not be able to understand the Bible. I think the preachers should take the time to read Revelation and explain it to the people about the churches. There is a lot to learn about the seven churches. I think the people should take the time to read and research the history, cultures, religion and values. When I was doing research about one of the churches, I wanted to know about it by questioning why’s and how’s about the church which led me back to the history and geography. I like history’s and there is so much more to learn about. I pray and hope that one day that people will open up their Bible and take the time to read and pray and see that God has a plan and tells what the future is going to look like of the return of Christ.

  17. The seven churches described in Revelation 2-3 are seven literal churches at the time that John the apostle was writing Revelation. Though they were literal churches in that time, there is also spiritual significance for churches and believer today. The first purpose of the letters was to communicate with the literal churches and meet their needs at that time. The second purpose is to reveal seven different types of individual/churches throughout history and instruct them in God’s truth.

    The problem of each seven churches describes issues that could fit the church in any time in its history. For example, Ephesus (Rev 2:1-7) – the church that had forsaken its first love. Smyrna (Rev 2:8-11) – the church that would suffer persecution. Pergamum (Rev 2:12-17) – the church that needed to repent. Thyatira (Rev. 2:18-29) – the church that had a false prophetess. Sardis (Rev. 3:1-6) – the church that had fallen asleep. Philadelphia (Rev. 3:7-13) – the church that had endured patiently. Laodicea (Rev. 3:14-22) – the church with the lukewarm faith.

    All we have the letters to the seven churches, which should be views on each problem that they are addressed to actual churches and deal with actual problems in those churches. And these churches symbolize the various types of churches that have existed and will exist throughout history. In our modern day every church undoubtedly fits the pattern of one of these churches. And also these churches represent the seven stages in the process of the history of the church, from the first century until today. Even though the history, culture and our living standard are changing year after year the word of God will remain and will never change until God himself change it.

  18. In the book of Revelations, in chapters two and three, seven churches are addressed through individual letters. These churches include Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia, and Laodicea. These letters are known to be the most applicable chapters in Revelation to the modern church and can often be separated from the confusing aspects of Revelation when being preached about. It helps that there is access to go on tours of these churches. Even though these are letters to real churches, there is a deeper meaning to take into consideration in order to uncover the history of the church. The church of Laodicean gives an interesting image of Jesus knocking on the outside door of the church asking to enter. Through this image, it is implying that Jesus was not already a part of this present-day church. It seems unreal to think about, but Revelation is a prophetic book. John uses these letters written to the seven churches as to be read literarily by the churches but also as the body of Christ as a whole in order to address certain issues arising in the church.
    I feel that people do not take history, geography and social setting when reading the book of Revelation simply because they do not understand it or have that knowledge. I grew up believing that Revelation was a difficult book to read and therefore had no desire in attempting to understand the complexity that goes with reading it. I feel that not enough pastors preach on this topic enough because it must be a difficult topic to gain a congregations interest in.

  19. One of the main questions posed in this blog post stood out to me amongst the rest: “Why do some people not take this history, geography, and social setting into consideration when they read Revelation?” This is a great question that I didn’t consider until I read through this passage. The answer provided by P Long immediately after sums it up very well. It is hard work! After writing a paper on the themes and significance of Revelation 2 two and three, I am beginning to understand why. After all of that, those were apparently the “easier” chapters to read and thoroughly study. I certainly can’t imagine writing a paper based on the themes later on in the book of Revelation. What strikes me as the most interesting aspect of these two chapters is their relatability to us today as believers. I think the point made about how these were real letters written for real churches is a brilliant one. I truly believe a greater understanding of Revelation as a whole can begin with a solid understanding of Revelation 2 and 3 as a gateway- and I would like to think that this is not by accident, maybe it was even perhaps as design. While there are many elements of the will of God we are not meant to understand, I definitely believe chapters two and three of Revelation are something we are meant to understand!

Leave a Reply