Acts 6:11-15 – The Charges Against Stephen

Stephen is arrested on false charges and put on trial (Acts 6: 11-15). The false charges against Stephen concern his attitude toward the Law and the Temple. Luke is clear that these are false charges against Stephen. He is not against the Law or the Temple.

Stoning Stephen RembrandtThe charges are similar to those brought against Jesus when he was before the Sanhedrin. Ben Witherington observes that Luke is patterning the death of Stephen after the trial and execution of Jesus.  There are at least ten things the two trials have in common, and two which only appear in Luke/Acts. First, both Jesus and Stephen commit their spirit to God and second both pray for forgiveness for his accusers.

This is an important observation since in the Gospels the Jewish people reject Jesus as the Messiah, in Acts they are rejecting the promised Holy Spirit, the foundation for the Messianic Kingdom.  Both rejections are punctuated by an execution of an innocent man. This in no way says anything about Stephen being exactly like Jesus. It is significant, however, that the first time a Jesus-follower is executed he dies just like Jesus did.

As for the charges, perhaps Stephen used Jesus’ statement that he would destroy the Temple and rebuild it in three days or his prediction the Temple would be destroyed in the near future in his preaching in the Synagogue. This could have been used against him in the same way Jesus was accused of threatening the Temple. Both Jesus and Stephen stand within a grand tradition of offering a critique of the Temple and the Priesthood. The prophets of the Hebrew Bible frequently condemned the priests and Temple worship (Jer 7, for example). The Essenes represent a Second Temple period critique and condemnation of the worship nearer the time of Jesus. A Jew saying the High Priest and Temple was corrupt was not particularly revolutionary–but to say the work of your teacher replaced the work of the Temple would have been radical.

Stephen represents a different strata of Second Temple period Judaism which has the potential to be more open to the gospel of Jesus as Messiah and the coming Kingdom of God.  But just like the Judean Jewish leadership, the synagogue of the Hellenists resist the Holy Spirit as well.  Stephen is therefore arrested like the Apostles have been before.

But in this case, Stephen gives a lengthy prophetic sermon condemning the Jewish aristocracy for their resistance against the Holy Spirit, leading to his dramatic execution at the end of chapter seven and the equally dramatic introduction of Saul of Tarsus, persecutor of the church.

Here is a problem for the readers of Acts.  Luke chose to place this story where he did, balancing his historical, literary and theological motives. Is this solely a critique of the Temple? What is happening in the unfolding story of salvation history in Acts 6-7? What is Luke’s point in placing this arrest, prophetic speech and lynching of Stephen at this point in his narrative?

8 thoughts on “Acts 6:11-15 – The Charges Against Stephen

  1. Luke’s account of Stephen’s speech and stoning is a climactic scenario leading into the introduction of Saul. It is obvious that Stephen is proclaiming a new found salvation through Jesus and that the temple is no longer of the same use. For now because of Christ’s death, we all are welcomed to come before the Lord without barriers (Mark 15:38; Eph. 2:14-15, 18). His speech points to God’s work outside of the Jewish people. He tells them that they “always resist the Holy Spirit!” (Acts 7:51). From this and other comments, he may be a sign to them that God is working through him and not them. No longer are they the leaders of the work that God did among His people. But, these apostles who are doing many signs and wonders and displaying the power of the Holy Spirit are being persecuted by the Sanhedrin. The story of Stephen here in Acts 6-7 is appropriately placed, for it signifies the transition that is starting to take place among the Jews and Gentiles.
    This climactic persecution and death of Stephen is also appropriately placed, for it gives incredible contrast to Saul’s opposition to the church. It only confirms what Stephen said in his speech about these people going against the Messiah and the Holy Spirit. They resisted the Messiah and they resist the work of the Holy Spirit which Stephen may be exemplifying. There are similarities mentioned in this account Luke gives, but could it be that Stephen is somewhat of a symbol of the Holy Spirit’s working, thus truly showing how the Jewish people, not only rejected Jesus as Messiah ending in His death, but they are also are rejecting the Holy Spirit, which is maybe confirmed through Stephen’s death.
    “But Stephen, full of the Holy Spirit, looked up to heaven and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing at the right hand of God. 56 ‘Look,’ he said, ‘I see heaven open and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God’” (Acts 7:55-56).


  2. I never really realized it before reading this but the fact that Stephen was the first follower that is executed was killed with parallels to Jesus’ death. I really think that Luke put this is where he did to make the point clear that this man who the Jews killed was the Messiah and that these Jews have turned away and have become resistant to the fact that they killed the Messiah. I would love to be able to take to a few of the jews that were present when Stephen was killed. Not the people that killed him necessarily the people throwing but the few that were standing around or passing by. These people were at the cross when Jesus died so they know what he said while He died and I really want to know if hearing the same words come from Stephen’s mouth cause a moment of doubt in what the others were doing. Did those people who understood that he repeated Jesus and was willing to die for Him have second thoughts about if what he was saying was really a false teaching? I love that Luke put this story right after Peter’s message because it shows the resistance from the different types of Jews to the message that they really did kill the Messiah.


  3. Well, I am just going to be blunt here. I am not entirely sure that the placing of this story in this place was such a huge deal. I think that Luke placed it where he did because he wanted to make sure that the reader would have plenty of background on the prior events before just hearing about what happened to Stephen. For example, how could the future reader know why the death of Stephen was significant unless they knew why he was dying? If the reader did not know about Pentecost and the coming of the Holy Spirit, they may not understand why Stephen was willing to defend them to the point of his death. Also, maybe Luke did not think that the reader would know the significant ties between Stephen’s death and Jesus’ death so he felt the need to give a back story. Maybe I’m under-thinking this situation, but maybe not.


    • You actually are giving me the sense it was a “big deal” to Luke to place the story here, in order “to make sure that the reader would have plenty of background.” I guess my point is Luke carefully designed this book in order to make his theological point (remember, it is a literary and theological history!)

      Liked by 1 person

  4. In terms of Stephen’s accusers, it is interesting that they initially attempted to oppose Stephen publicly and couldn’t withstand his arguments or the Spirit within him. With the many similarities mentioned above between Jesus and Stephen, this actually fits as well (though it is prior to chapter 7 and the trial). Many times the Pharisees, Sadducees, and others tried to argue with Jesus publicly and were always unable to outwit Him or make Him trip on His own words. Similarly, Stephen seems to be preaching emphatically in the area. And just like with Jesus, those who opposed Stephen had to meet secretly to come up with a way to arrest him.
    When he is finally arrested, the accusation that he stands against Temple and law (and even Moses indirectly) is a broad and vague accusation without any substantial evidence (as pointed out by Luke who says they were “false witnesses” [Acts 6:13]).
    It seems that Luke places this story at this exact point in the book to show the lack of interest that the Jews have in the Messiah of Jesus. They don’t want to lose the Temple (because it is a physical manifestation of God’s forgiveness of sins), and they don’t want to lose the power that they currently keep as the heads of the Old Testament-like religion (I say this because at this point even the Sanhedrin are adding things to the law and operating under a strict set of rules that were never intended by the Old Testament law). Stephen’s message, though it is unlikely that he directly opposed the Temple as a whole, is a strike at the heart of the current Jewish state of religious affairs. Stephen is accusing the entire Jewish leadership of being corrupt and not following God’s law any longer (Acts 7:51-53).
    Often in life, we take the least of many matters as a way to strike back at those who have found an inaccuracy in our logic or arguments. It seems to be the same with the Sanhedrin. They have heard a strong argument from Stephen regarding the state of their spiritual standing with God, but they would rather blame him for speaking out against the Temple and not their own actions and hearts. As such, they stone him and kill him. This is a turning point in the book of Acts, because the following chapters show the disciples branching out away from Jerusalem, even to the Gentiles! We like to use the scene of Jesus standing at the right hand of the Father as a final judgment piece against the Jews, but really, the Jews had made the decision on their own before that moment…they don’t want to change because they are comfortable in their own standing, and Stephen threatens their physical and material position as the authority in the Temple and religion. They have rejected Jesus as the Messiah, the Holy Spirit as the direction to point their thoughts, and God the Father as the ultimate source of worth and worship. They are now centered on themselves, and as such, Luke will take the story where the gospel message will go next – Samaria and then to the ends of the earth (Acts 1:8 foreshadowing).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.