Because it was written about the same time as the book of Revelation, 4 Ezra is one of the more important apocalyptic books. The Jewish apocalypse (chapters 3-14) was probably written about A.D. 100 based on the opening verse which states the book was written thirty years after Jerusalem was destroyed. This verse claims to be the words of the main character in the story, Ezra, at the time of the destruction of Jerusalem in 586 B.C. Since the book discusses the problem of the fall of Jerusalem it is applicable to either A.D. 70 or 135.
Metzger finds it unlikely a Jewish book would find popularity in the post-Bar Kokhba world, so probably the central section was not written after even A.D. 120 (OTP 1:520. Charles 2:552 concurs with this date, although he tries to separate various sources in the text in order to date them earlier. Michael Stone dates the book to the last decade of the first century, see “Esdras, Second Book of,” in ABD 2:611-614).
The Christian framework was added in the second half of the third century. Collins states there is a “consensus” the Jewish apocalypse was written in Palestine at the end of the first century while Metzger takes the reference to Babylon in 3:1 as Rome; the book is therefore the product of Diaspora Jews (Apocalyptic Imagination, 196).
Chapters 1-2 of 4 Ezra are a Christian composition known as either 2 Esdras or 5 Ezra. After a brief genealogical introduction (1:1-3) Ezra is called to prophetic ministry (1:4-11). Ezra is to declare to the people of Israel their sins. To do this, Ezra describes the Exodus (1:12-14), the wilderness journeys (1:15-20) and the conquest (1:21-23) and shows that God did great things for the people, but they responded by breaking the covenant.
God addresses the people through Ezra, wondering what he will do with his rebellious people (1:24-32). God declares that he will reject his people and no longer listen to their pleas (1:25) and drive them away like straw in the wind (1:22-37). God did send them leaders such as Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, then the 12 Minor Prophets (listed in the order of the LXX). Israel is to be scattered and God has become as a widow (2:1-7).
After a short “woe” against Assyria which seems out of place, God says the Kingdom of Jerusalem will be taken away from Israel and given to “my people,” presumably Christians. God has rejected the nation of Israel as his people, and according to this text, he has turned to the gentiles. In 2:33-41 Ezra calls to the nations because Israel has rejected God: “O nations, await your true shepherd” (The editor of OTP inserts “Ezra turns to the Gentiles” as a section heading for 2:33-41, which seems a bit more than the text says).
Chapter 2:15-32 is an ethical section inserted between the sections on Israel’s rejection. Beginning in verse 20 there is a list of actions which are expected from the people of God. Isaiah and Jeremiah are described as the servants of God sent to help Ezra as he reminds his readers of the ethical demands required of them. Some of the ethical statements which following in verse 20 are in fact drawn from Isaiah 1:17 and Jeremiah 7: guard the rights of the widow and the orphan, clothe the naked, care for the injured and weak, protect the lame and the blind, protect the old and properly bury the dead. Burial of the dead is not a factor in Isaiah and Jeremiah, but it is an important issue to first century Judaism. That Second Temple Judaism considered proper burial important is seen in the apocryphal book of Tobit. One of the “good deeds” of Tobit is the burial of the dead, see 1:18-20, 2:3-8, 4:3-4; 6:15; 14:10-13.
There is a hint of resurrection in 2:16: “I will raise up the dead from their places and bring them out from their tombs.” Since it is followed by ethical commands, it is possible that some sort of spiritual resurrection is in mind here (the passing from death to life at the salvation, etc.) Coupled with the reference to the shepherd in 2:34, it is possible the writer has Ezekiel 34 and 37 in mind. There is a resurrection in 37:1-14 (the valley of dry bones) and the true shepherd in 34:1-19.
The Christian section draws to a close with a vision of a great multitude in Zion (2:42-48). This crowd received crowns and are given palm branches by the Son of God because they have confessed him in the world (2:47). This Son of God is described briefly as a young man of great stature, taller than the rest and more exalted as well.
Reblogged this on Talmidimblogging.
Not much is heard about Christian apocalyptic literature. Usually, people just say that it is hard to understand since the author is trying to describe something they have never seen before. There is also not much apocalyptic literature in the Bible. I am curious to know why being written around the same time as Revelation makes 4 Ezra more important? Does it give the book more credibility? Is it simply for purposes of comparing the two books since they were written around the same time? Is the Ezra author of this book supposed to be the same Ezra from the Old Testament? I think it is very interesting that the first chapter includes Ezra’s call to ministry, his job, and how he presents his message. I suppose this is true for many Biblical characters, for example, we get Mose’s entire life story, his call to return as God’s messenger, and his response. However, I also think there are a great many characters who we do not know much about except that God suddenly decided to use them and called them for a purpose. We do not know much about Jonah, or even Daniel before God called them. The majority of what we hear about them is what happened when God was using them for his purpose, even if they rebelled against his plan. The book also says that God has rejected his people, Israel, because of their rebellion and turned to the Gentiles. I do not think this is accurate. The Israelites are God’s people, called by his name and chosen to be his. While it saddens him when they reject him or rebel against him, I do not think he rejects them. Yes, he welcomes the Gentiles too, but he does not have to reject the Israelites in order to accept Gentiles too.
Seems really sketch to me. You can’t write “prophecies” and post-attribute them to an author from hundreds of years prior. Joseph Smith did that with the Mormon and Moroni; supposedly receiving their prophecies from thousands of years ago and magically they just happened to be really super accurate predictions of the future. That kind of post-dating of literature is an absolutely horrible way to make prophecies and I would be utterly disappointed to find out that God was engaged in that sort of malpractice. If the book hadn’t been rejected from the official cannons apologists today would be up a creek without a paddle.
This blog does a great job explaining 4 Ezra and its clear influence of apocalyptic literature. This book was culturally significant within the time this book was written. This book which was written in 100 A.D begins with the Jewish apocalyptic teachings while the Christian addition to this book was added a few centuries later. Ezra is a key part of understanding the state of Judaism and Christianity during this time. It also gives way to understanding what the main concerns and desires of these times were. This literature follows the theme of most apocalyptic literature, the theme of Gods judgment. “God addresses the people through Ezra, wondering what he will do with his rebellious people (1:24-32). God declares that he will reject his people and no longer listen to their pleas (1:25) and drive them away like straw in the wind (1:22-37)” (Long,2016). The book of Ezra follows a similar theme to Enoch and other exile literature. An early Christian or Jew reading this literature would have been encouraged with the hope that is to come. Whether in the first coming of the Messiah or the second.
The introduction to 4 Ezra highlights the complex and multi-layered authorship, blending Jewish apocalyptic themes with later Christian theological developments. Written around the same time as the Book of Revelation, 4 Ezra addresses important theological concerns, particularly around the fall of Jerusalem. The book explores themes of divine justice and the fate of the righteous and wicked, much like other apocalyptic literature of its time. Scholars generally agree that the core Jewish text was written around A.D. 100, a period marked by turmoil and reflection in the aftermath of the Jewish-Roman conflicts.
The Christian sections of 4 Ezra, which are added later, reframe the original text within a Christian context, as evidenced by the references to the “Son of God” and the turning of God’s favor from Israel to the Gentiles. This reflects the growing Christian narrative that the Kingdom of God, once symbolized by Jerusalem, was now being offered to the Gentiles. The ethical teachings in chapters 2:15-32, which stress care for the marginalized, reflect Jewish values of justice while also foreshadowing Christian ideals, particularly the resurrection of the dead, which hints at early Christian eschatological thought.
Overall, 4 Ezra offers both a glimpse into the Jewish apocalyptic worldview during the late first century and an insight into the formative Christian interpretations that would shape the early church’s understanding of salvation, judgment, and the afterlife. It’s a text that crosses boundaries between Judaism and Christianity, inviting readers into a world of ethical reflection, divine mystery, and eschatological hope.
The interplay with the Christian and Jewish sections of 4 Ezra are interesting. It’s clear that the first couple chapters are written from a Christ centered perspective, a Christian who would seem to have relatively strong replacement theology. The Jewish people are seen as deserving their suffering because of the sins committed and the actions taken in which God is rejected. The questions of why God would allow suffering for his chosen people is answered in the Christian addition with the harsh reality that God’s favor has been removed and placed upon the gentiles. “Ezra describes the Exodus (1:12-14), the wilderness journeys (1:15-20) and the conquest (1:21-23) and shows that God did great things for the people, but they responded by breaking the covenant” (long, 2016). Yet even with the breaking of the covenant, the main message in Ezra 4 is that Israel is still central to God’s plans, even if they must endure the deserved punishments. It could be said that the enduring of the Israelite people is futile, since the gentiles would be the ones to gain the favor in the end. God addresses the people through Ezra, wondering what he will do with his rebellious people (1:24-32) (Long, 2016). Ultimately while the Jewish section of this book may be concerned with the subject of justice for his own people and nation, the Christian section presents the answer to the question “what will God do with these people.”
So if I am understanding this correctly, the text was originally written by Jews (at least several pieces and sections were) and then added to by Christians a little later? This makes it similar to the testament of Solomon because it is a hodge podge of various authors and groups. In this blog you state, “God says the Kingdom of Jerusalem will be taken away from Israel and given to “my people,” presumably Christians”. Is this supposed to be the heavenly Jerusalem like in the book of Revelation or the literal place on the world map? Because reading this gives me crusader vibes. Israel and Jerusalem are our holy city because we are his people now. It seems like the kind of theology that would later be used for the crusades. It also seems a bit antisemitic. Christians coming in to change and warp a Jewish text to say that God has abandoned the Jewish people feels antisemitic and part of a theology that fuels it to this day.
You bring up some of the ethical considerations the text makes. Interestingly, burial of the dead is not mentioned in Isaiah and Jeremiah. While much of the ethical concerns are in the New Testament, burial of the dead is not. This is interesting given the importance of the burial of Jesus in the New Testament. Finally, the idea of spiritual resurrection is interesting. It is found in the New Testament from Paul quite often. However, unlike 4th Ezra, Paul has a strong concept of a physical resurrection.