The author of Jude identifies himself simply as Jude, brother of James and servant of Jesus Christ. There are eight New Testament persons with the name Jude (Greek, Judas, or Hebrew, Judah), but the most likely is Jude the brother of Jesus. Of the various persons named Jude in the New Testament, only the brother of Jesus and James would be well known enough to identify himself so simply.
If Jude was the brother of Jesus, why does he not say so in his letter? Why use the title “servant of Jesus?” The fact that Jude and the other brothers of Jesus were unbelievers until after the resurrection, the title “servant of Jesus” can be seen as a humble acknowledgment of Jesus’ Lordship.
Objections to this identification center on the language of the book, which seems too Hellenistic for an author who grew up in Galilee. The vocabulary is obscure and is full of rare words, including thirteen words not found elsewhere in the New Testament. This objection does not carry much weight since the author is familiar with at least two popular apocryphal texts, indicating some degree of education and sophistication.
We know virtually nothing about Jude, the brother of Jesus, in the New Testament. Jude is listed in Matt 13:55 and Mark 6:3 simply as a brother of Jesus. He likely was not a believer during the ministry of Jesus, (Mark 3:21, 31). He would have become a believer after the resurrection (Acts 1:14), but we know nothing of his conversion, whether he was a witness to the resurrection, etc. The “brothers of Jesus” are mentioned in 1 Cor 9:5 as having taken believing wives, although it is not clear whether this is literal brothers or not.
According to tradition reported by Julian Africanus, the brothers of Jesus were involved in missionary activity. Eusebius. (Hist. Eccl. 1.7.14) says that the family of Jesus evangelized Palestine. In another section (Hist. Eccl., 3.19.1 – 20.8) the grandsons of Jude are arrested during the reign of Domitian. Since they are in the line of David, they are potential messianic pretenders. Domitian allegedly interview them but they claimed to be farmers – as evidenced by their calloused hands! This story has always struck me as legendary, since I cannot imagine Domitian rounding up potential Jewish rebels from Palestine.
It is somewhat intriguing that a brother of Jesus should write a book which is so much dependent on the Hebrew Bible. Perhaps, like his brother James, Jude was well trained in the Hebrew Bible and able to use the scripture to argue against a false teaching within Jewish Christian communities.
It is not critical that the Jude of the letter of Jude is a brother of Jesus. This tradition helps explain how a letter like this was accepted as canonical, but it is not required by the text since it does not state that the writer is the brother of Jesus.
“It is somewhat intriguing that a brother of Jesus should write a book which is so much dependent on the Hebrew Bible. Perhaps, like his brother James, Jude was well trained in the Hebrew Bible and able to use the scripture to argue against a false teaching within Jewish Christian communities.”(P.Long)
I wonder if the sons of Joseph were better off than the average carpenter’s son? What if Joseph was a rich man able to send his son’s off to be trained under respected rabbis? Or if they had some connection with the Essenes. It just seems that apart from the skills of their respective secretaries, James and Jude, have considerable knowledge of the Old Testament, and Jude specifically has knowledge of 2nd temple literature. “Not only does Jude display astounding economy of thought, ti also demonstrates a thorough acquaintance with and calculated use of Jewish literary sources.” (FttE, 223) Not only is he familiar with these sources he seems to be an expert in written rhetoric. “The modern reader becomes witness to a literary-rhetorical artist at work, as graphic symbolism, word-play, frequent alliteration, parallelism, the use of triplets, typology, midrash and woe-cry in a tightly-packed “word of exhortataion”-all this with the remarkably brief span of only twenty-five verses of text.”(FttE, 224) In fact, I would propose that James and Jude have more features in common in that they both write in the style of the OT prophets. One is reminded of the word-play in Micah 1, as well as the theme of righteous judgment against the unrighteous. If Jude, the brother of Jesus, was the original author of Jude, and James, the brother of Jesus, was the original author of James, then it would seem consistent that the brothers would write in similar fashion, as prophets.
I would argue that is did not matter if Jesus’ family were rich or not. Every good Jew would send their kids to a Jewish ‘school’ to learn the scriptures. Even today many Jews in the middle east send their children to ‘Jew’ schools. Usually by the end of the schooling each child has memorized the entire Pentateuch. If this is how Jewish Children were all trained than it is not surprising that Christ’s brothers would be so knowledgable with the Scriptures. It is also possible that Christ’s brothers excelled in their training and were eventually moved on to higher levels of Jewish academic training. The answer can not simply be that Joseph was rich.
I would have to agree with you Jon. Every good Jew of Jesus day studied the scriptures regularly. Even the disciple Peter found himself constantly sticking his foot in his mouth as he rebuked Jesus with his knowledge of the scripture. Little did he know that his knowledge of the scripture was just a bit out of balance. I believe that just as muslims of our day are trained from infancy up to believe in Allah, a majority of Jews living around Jesus lifetime and during the apostolic period had a firm grasp on the holy scriptures. I would even think many of Jews of that time period learned how to read from the Bible. They most likely did not have Dr. seuss books in Jerusalem and the cities surrounding it.
I think it is very interesting that Jude introduces himself as “a servant of Jesus Christ and a brother of James” (Jude 1). For one he must be very well known in order to be just known as the brother of James. He must have been well traveled and well known in churches around the country to send out a letter introducing himself with so little of a title. We are obviously expected to know who James is as well. I think it is interesting that Jude may have been one of the brothers of Jesus Christ but that he introduces himself as a servant of Jesus Christ. I like that he does that because it shows us that Jude respects the ministry of Christ and that he values him as a spiritual leader rather than just a brother.
I really do not know who Jude is. I do not know if he is the brother of Jesus or some random guy. But when he said that he is a servant of Jesus, that could mean a lot of different things, but even though I do not know what it means, I would assume that it means that he is the brother of Jesus. It does help explain why a letter like this would be in the canon, but I also think that it is a powerful piece of writing that a man wrote. Whoever Jude is, I think that we should assume that he wrote Jude and not some other person. But I do think that we have to hold fast that when he said that he was the brother of James, that we assume that he was the brother of a James. We do not know what James, but it would be easy to say that it was the same James as the brother of Jesus also.
“We do not know what James…” Jessica – I think this is an interesting observation, especially when combined with the observation at the very beginning of the post, “There are eight New Testament persons with the name Jude (Greek, Judas, or Hebrew, Judah), but the most likely is Jude the brother of Jesus.” I agree that with such a simple title, this person must have been well known, or at least have assumed that his brother James would be well known enough for people to recognize that name. It reminds me of when siblings go to the same school. When my sisters would meet people that I might know, they would say, “I’m Holly, Casey’s sister.” It may be the same sort of thing.
However, is there any evidence that any of the ‘eight’ NT Judes had siblings, and is there any suggestion as to what their names are. It seems very unlikely that each of these eight men would have had a brother named James. Like I said, the simple introduction doesn’t necessarily mean that Jude was extremely well known, but it could just mean that James was a very recognizable person in the Christian movement, which only solidifies more strongly the thought that it would be Jude, the brother of James, the brother of Jesus.
Many good comments made by all. I too am pretty confident that Jude was probably Jesus’ half brother. James would have been well known. I like Casey’s idea of familarity- identifying yourself with somebody with a reknown reputation. This idea fits in well with Jude being accepted as canonical. Jacob Rodger’s idea of Jesus’ family as being slightly more sucessful than most people thought of and thus accounting for the mastery and knowledge that both James and Jude show is intriguing as well but speculative. Another important, less so now, is it the early church tradition of Jesus’ brothers evangelizing Palestine that Phil Long makes. Taking all these points together makes a pretty solid case for Jude being Jesus’ half brother, the brother of James. It would have been nice however if Jude just came out and said he was Jesus’ half brother. His humility prevented him from doing so and everybody at the time knew it. To mention it would have been seen as bragging- unspiritual. Something his epistle speaks against: “. . .and they mouth great swelling words. . .” (16).
I would have to agree that Jude the author of the book of Jude was Jesus half brother. The most interesting thing about Jude is his conversion after the resurrection of Jesus. His denunciation of false teachers would lead a reader to believe that he had been well established as a believer for the larger portion of his life. He wrote that “They are godless men, who change the grace of our God into a license for immorality and deny Jesus Christ our only Sovereign and Lord” (Jude 4). This comes across as a very bold statement for the half brother of the Son of God who denied the deity of the Lord Jesus Christ himself. If Jude was written by the half brother of Jesus, the book most definitely displays the power of God to change even the most hardened hearts.
P.Long, it seems to me that you do not sufficiently defend against these objections. You seem to shrug them off, but just because James was well instructed in Scriptures does not quite necessitate or even demand that Jude had the same education. What evidence is there from the first century that Jews (or any one from any ethnicity) had the money to send all their children to be educated in the Law and Prophets? Especially a family from Nazareth.
I suppose you could argue that a man who is rich enough to take his family (and servants?) to Egypt and then back again to escape persecution would have money enough to educate his children. However, he himself is from Nazareth, and Nazareth is known for being a back water “hick” town, so that when Jesus begins ministering he almost seems laughable when those around him find that he is from Nazareth. With Galilee, and Nazareth particularly, having such a reputation it would seem unlikely (apart from divine help) that even if he owned a carpentry company in town that he would have that kind of money.
Formal education would have been done in Jerusalem and that it quite the hike to send all his children to be educated there while trying to maintain a practice (or a single job) by himself.
It would seem that a better choice or at least an equally plausible option would be that Jude is written as an alias and that, even though these words may still be inspired, the author would be someone who wrote with Jude as an authority at best. This is most certainly not unheard of in the ancient world and with Hebrews being anonymous, it doesn’t seem like it would be too out of the realm as affecting the canonicity of the book.
(How was that P.Long? I was bored so I gave your suggestion a try.)
Jude’s education, whether he is the brother of Jesus or not, is in the Hebrew Bible and clearly represents Palestinian Judaism of the first century. He cites the Hebrew Bible, not the LXX, he alludes the Pentateuch (exclusively? VandeVrede point this out in class), and the non-canonical material is of interest to the Jews only (1 Enoch was popular at Qumran). All of this could point to an education at the feet of a teacher, perhaps a Pharisee but maybe even an Essene. This could take place in Galilee as much as any place.
If Jude is the brother of Jesus, there is no reason to think he was stuck in Nazareth his whole life!
I also think that there is some evidence that Galilee is not the backwater that we make it out to be, since there is evidence of wealthy homes using stoneware (as opposed to pottery), and at least one large administrative archive has been found.
After reading through Jude again, I begin to think that Jude had a humble spirit when he labeled himself as a servant of Jesus Christ. This view may not carry much weight with most theologians, but I tend to believe that the title he gave himself gives credit to his brother Jesus Christ. I believe he is humbly acknowledging the Lordship of Christ with a repentant spirit for his unbelief before the resurrection.
It is not surprising that Jude does not vocalize that he is indeed the half-brother of Jesus. James the Just, who was also the half brother of Jesus never mentions the fact in Scripture, whether in the book of Acts or in his own writing in the letter of James. It is not critical that the “Judah” who penned the book of Jude is recognized by being the half-brother of Jesus.
Jobes points out the fact that Jude makes the assumption that people who receive Jude’s letter know who James is when he writes “a brother of James” in Jude 1 (Jobes 236). Although, as Jobes points out, Judas was a very popular name among men of Jesus time, it is clear that the even though there were several men named Judas who interacted with Jesus, the adaptation of claiming to be the brother of James clarifies which Judas it is (Jobes 236-9).
Jude is in a way writing through the authority of his brother and using him to ensure that his readers were listening to what he had written. This use of authority was not a bad thing but rather gave Jude an active and listening audience to what he had to say.
It is unfortunate that there is a lack of evidence recorded about Jude, whether in Scriptural or historical writings or even church tradition. Because we know that, like James, Jude experienced life with Jesus in a different way it would have been amazing to see what his perspective was and hear his story of faith.
As we read through the book of Jude and this article it is trying to better understand who the author of this book really is. As the article talks about there were quite a few other people in that time with the name Jude. But reading farther along in this book I also have to agree it’s the brother of Jesus. As the article reads it would make sense that he would be as then it remains in canonical order. But on the flip side it might not be because it doesn’t state who the author really is. It seems like in the New Testament we don’t know exactly who the author is. But as we read through these books some are very descriptive and have a lot of stories that Jesus did, with this being said we should notice this and connect the dots to the signs in which they could be brothers or disciples. With this being said and noticing how descriptive Jude is I would say it was someone very close to Jesus in his life.
I love how Jude simply introduces himself as a “servant of Jesus Christ”. As this article suggests it is a humble admission that Jesus is Lord but I think that it is more than that. It is also Jude admitting that he was wrong about his own brother because he did not believe that his brother was who he said he is. Can you imagine the irritation of having Jesus as your brother? It would be kind of hard for anyone to live with. After the resurrection, Jude was converted and so in saying that he was simply a servant of Christ he was admitting that he was wrong. As far as whether Jude should be in the cannon I think that God is the God of truth. His word is the truth so God would not allow something that is not truth stand in his word. God has protected his word through generations and I believe that he is still protecting his word today. I also believe that the order of scriptures is something that God is in control of and he is protecting it. I do believe that Jude should be a part of the cannon.
First and foremost, Jude’s familial relationship with Jesus Christ should make this book a much more read and discussed book in the Bible. I reiterated this thought when in a blog post on the book of James, and that thought indicates that a book with a potential viewpoint from a sibling and brother of Jesus should never be ignored. Obviously, no book in the Bible is not important. Therefore, no book in the Bible should be ignored. One would think that it is obvious that Christians and students of the Bible that want to be as close to Jesus Christ as possible, as well as imitate Christ, then they would definitely want to thoroughly read, study, and develop a high-level interpretation of a text that comes from a family member of Jesus. Our family members are the people who typically know us the best and get to see us the most. Therefore, the book of Jude, as well as the book of James, may offer in-depth insights into the life of Jesus that other writers may not be able to offer. This is something that is important to note about Jude and the book of Jude.
Like other books in the Bible and books that we have studied throughout this course, the author of the book of Jude is not set in stone. However, Jobes (2011, p. 236) indicates that the fact that he is a brother of James, it is expected that he is referring to the half-brother of Jesus, for that is the man who is most likely to be recognized the the audience of Jude is James, the half-brother of Jesus Christ, for this James held a position of leadership for the Jerusalem church. This idea is repeated in the original blog post above. This point is an important point because it favors the idea that Jude held a familial relationship with Jesus Christ.
There are two other concepts and ideas that I noticed on this blog post that caught my attention were the fact that there is not a vast amount of information about who Jude is in the Bible and the fact that the book of Jude includes thirteen rare words that are not found in any other books in the New Testament. First and foremost, it is odd to me that the New Testament has so much to write about in regards to Jesus Christ, but it lacks information and references to his family. This is the case it seems for Mary, Joseph, Jude, etc. Obviously, Jesus is the important figure of the message of Christianity and the gospel, so it is not expected that there are countless stories of Jude in the Bible, but due to his familial relationship with Jesus Christ, one would think that there would be a few more references to Jude in the Bible. Additionally, the fact that the book of Jude has unique language is interesting and offers an insight into the background and upbringing of Jude. How do these thirteen words impact one’s interpretation of the text?
Jobes, K. H. (2011). The Letters to the Church. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
It is extremely surprising to me that Jude is included in the Bible. While the book is not heretical, it does address texts that are not canonical such as 1 Enoch. This helps promote the argument that Jude was the brother of Jesus. It promotes it because these Jewish texts would have been well known amongst Jewish communities. It seems as though, from the Scriptures, that James the brother of Jesus is well versed in the Jewish Law and is known beyond what a carpenter from Galilee would be. This gives some solidification that another brother of Jesus could also be well versed in Jewish Law, culture, and literature. I think Jake Rodgers is on to something when he proposes that Joseph’s sons may have had the opportunity to have an education. If two of Jesus’ brothers are clearly well versed in the Hebrew Bible and one is versed in second temple literature then maybe these sons of Joseph were able to get a formal education?
Jude also believing in Jesus as his Savior would have come after the resurrection which makes sense as to why he, along with his brother James, would humble themselves by presenting themselves as “servants” to Jesus (Jude 1:1, James 1:1). This piece of humility that comes from both brothers is a significant sign that these men truly believe in Jesus Christ. This act of humility validates these letters more than they would be otherwise. As a believer, seeing the immediate position of humility from an author makes me want to engage with the text more. The first thing that Jude does when he opens the letter is humble himself and this is exactly what we should do when we approach anything. We need to humble ourselves before the Lord and he will exalt us (James 4:10).
The various authorships debated in these Jewish New Testament books is interesting, no one is ever sure who wrote them. I also find it intriguing how many traditions or legends are ascribed to these alleged authors, and how much of a difference that makes in actually determining who wrote the book. In Jude’s case it was surprising to see how much of a difference the supposed association of being Jesus’ half-brother affected the canonship of the book (Long, 2010). When reading through Jobes, one particular point of interest stood out, that many Catholics interpret that Jesus’ brothers were actually his cousins (2011, p. 237). I find this interesting, because I vaguely remember having this conversation with a friend of mine who taught at a Catholic school. She was explaining some of the differences in beliefs she had experienced, and she remarked how weird this idea sounded. The fact that some believe in Mary’s lifelong virginity is something that I had never considered before, but would be impactful depending on the context. It is obvious that Jesus never had any full siblings, but my assumption always was that he had other half-siblings through Mary and Joseph. It would be interesting to dive deeper into this concept, may with some word, context, and culture studies. Although it really is not that important in the grand scheme of things, I do find it interesting for whatever reason.
References
Jobes, K. H. (2011). Letters to the Church: A Survey of Hebrews and the General Epistles. Zondervan.
The author of Jude identifies himself as, “Jude.” Jude is the brother of James and half-brother of Jesus (Matt. 13:55; Mark 6:3). However, we cannot be certain the author of Jude is the brother of Jesus because he does not identify himself as the brother of Jesus. There is a reverence in the fact that he refers to himself as a “servant of Jesus” instead of the brother of Jesus. Although the brothers of Jesus appear to be very well versed in the Scriptures, they did not start believing until after the resurrection (Mark 3:21).
The author of the book of Jude has a strong understanding of the Scriptures along with the Greek language, this is seen as he used thirteen words that are not used elsewhere in the New Testament. Therefore, this could be a controversial point, protesting the author being the brother of Jesus. However, upon further investigation, we cannot fully know what version of the Scriptures (Greek or Hebrew) he was exposed to.
Not much is known about Jude, the brother of Jesus, apart from him being mentioned in Matthew 13:55 and Mark 6:3 as the brother of Jesus. Knowing that James, another brother of Jesus, was deeply involved in ministry, one could make the stretch that Jude was also deeply involved in ministry. On this matter, it is said that “the brothers of Jesus were involved in ministry” (Hist.Eccl.1.7.14) and that “they helped evangelize Palestine” (Hist.Eccl.3.19.1-20.8). The grandsons of Jude are also arrested during the reign of Domitian and accused of being potential Messianic Pretenders. However, this is a skeptical story at best.
It is interesting to think about the people that God used to write his holy words. I think it is important to avoid getting hung up on who the author was as a person as “it is not critical that Jude of the letter of Jude was a brother of Jesus” (Long, 2010). This is especially true since the author of Jude does not even specifically mention being a brother of Jesus, but rather only as a brother of James (Jude 1). Of course, James was also a brother of Jesus so if the author were the brother of Jesus this would be fitting. One could argue that by being a follower of Jesus Jude was a “brother” of Jesus regardless of if he was biologically his brother. When Jesus was told that his mother and brothers were looking for him, “He looked at those seated in a circle around him and said, “Here are my mother and my brothers! Whoever does God’s will is my brother and sister and mother.” (Mark 3:34). Jesus didn’t seem to put the same importance of being related by blood that we hold by human traditions. It matters who wrote the book of Jude, but what matters more is the substance of the letters of Jude.
There were several men named Jude, or Judas, in the New Testament. Jude is a derivative of the names Judas and Judah. But three men named Jude (Judas) had significant roles in Jesus’ day: Judas Iscariot, Judas the apostle (not Iscariot) and Jude the half-brother of Jesus and the brother of James.
Jude was among the siblings of Jesus who, at first, did not believe his claims to be the Messiah (John 7:3-5). It was most likely after the resurrection that Jude and his brother James came to understand that their half-brother, Jesus indeed the Son of God. It was that shift in perspective that motivated Jude to define himself not as “the brother of the Messiah” but as “a servant of Jesus Christ” (Jude 1:1).
That clearly identifies him to the first century reader, for Jude’s brother James was well known as a leader in the early church in Jerusalem. He grew up in the town of Nazareth, as did Jesus. However, we notice that he says nothing about being physically related to the Lord, Jesus. I believe that Jude had learned to see Jesus no longer as “my bother Jesus,” but as he truly was, God poured into human flesh, the Son of God, the Savior of the world. Jude and James had a unique perspective on Jesus. They worshiped and were disciples of the one with whom they had grown up.
If anyone would be in a position to refute his claim to be God, it would be Jesus’ brother. Although Jude until after the resurrection, the statement at the beginning of Jude’s letter is show that the deity of Jesus of Nazareth.
I think this is an interesting question and one I know has been long debated. I think it is important to note that knowing the author gives us more insight into the time period, audience, and thoughts of the writer which likely helped/influenced the piece as a whole. While there are books where we can only speculate the author and they still serve great purpose I think it is still important to know as much about each book as possible. So, it only makes sense to attempt to match Jude with its proper author. In chapter 8 of her book Letters to the church, Karen Jobes states, “Judus (Jude was a common name” (p. 236). With this knowledge it would seem daunting to narrow down which Jude was the author. But as Long shares some insightful background information I think it is interesting to attempt to solve the mystery. Long shows us that there is much knowledge to be gained about the author through the piece itself, but also in the history and information surrounding the piece. I think it’s fascinating.
Jude is known as one of the twelve disciples of Jesus, according to the bible Jude is known as brother of James and servant of Jesus Christ. He is also one of the luckiest people in the bible because he is the brother of Jesus. He is lucky because he might likely spend some time with Jesus as they grow up together, but that’s only my thought, but then it is also controversial whether Jobes is a brother of Jesus or not. According to Jobes, it is interesting that Jobes mentioned “many Catholics interpret that Jesus’ brothers were actually his cousins (Jobes, 2011, p. 237). Which is interesting and something to think about. According to (John 7-3-5) It is known that Jude didn’t accept Jesus as the full Messiah, but later in his life after the resurrection of Jesus, Jude converted, and he began to acknowledge that Jesus to be Messiah. In (Jude 1:1), Jude claims that he is not a brother of Jesus, but he is a servant of Jesus. This is similar to James’ statement, at this point, I believe that Jude is also very humble about this, and “servant of Jesus” can be seen as a humble acknowledgment of Jesus’ Lordship as mentioned in the article. It is interesting how Jude’s lifestyles aren’t mentioned enough in the scripture and it is very skeptical to think about whether he was in the resurrection of Jesus or not. Personally, I only knew that Jesus had a brother and that I was James, but I also believe that Jude was the brother of James and he is somehow related to Jesus Christ.
Jude starts out his letter as, “Jude, a servant of Jesus Christ and brother of James…” (Jude 1). It is clear here since he states it himself that he is the brother of James, but what is also believed is that this Jude could also be the brother of Jesus. Although he does not come out and state that he is the brother of Jesus, it makes sense because he could be doing so to keep on the down low. Instead of identifying himself as Jesus’ brother, he chooses to identify himself as a servant of Jesus Christ. By doing so like Plong said, Jude is humbly acknowledging Jesus’ Lordship. Multiple times throughout the chapter as well, Jude continues to point back to Jesus Christ as Lord, and our Master. He continues to God as the Father and how He has been faithful to His people throughout time. Although we might be able to think that Jude the author is the brother of Jesus, it isn’t necessarily crucial to the writings that the Jude is the brother of Jesus or not, because it doesn’t say it clearly in the text.
In regards to Jude actually being the brother of Jesus, when Plong talked about how Jude was most likely not a believer until after the resurrection of Jesus, I was really surprised. You would think Jesus’ own siblings would definitely believe, especially growing up with Him. But it also doesn’t surprise me at the same time, knowing that they were still human and sometimes siblings tend to have a more aggressive view on their siblings than others might. I can see where that issue of human flesh and being siblings might come into play in regards to following Jesus or not. It also makes me wonder even more about the rest of Jesus’ siblings and if they believed or not, and what that dynamic would’ve looked like in their family.
The Book of Jude was written by someone who identifies themselves as a δοῦλος of Jesus and an ἀδελφός of James (Jude 1). Assuming this self-identification is accurate, and not the product of a pseudonymous author, this limits the possibility of authorship, with the most likely option being Jude the brother of Jesus (Long, 122). Of course, objections and immediate questions present themselves, such as the quality of Greek used in the book, with several unique words not found elsewhere in the New Testament. Yet, one may be able to argue that Jude’s inevitable dependence on the Old Testament (LXX) and Second Temple Literature such as the Book of Enoch and the Assumption of Moses may help explain the distinctive language. The nature of authorship is interesting when considering Jude as it wouldn’t make sense for a pseudonymous author to simply proclaim himself as the servant of Jesus, as opposed to establishing his family relationship to Jesus. This singular identification as a servant of Jesus may be a humble acknowledgment of Christ’s lordship (Long, 2010), which may make more sense with a traditional authorship.
It is often argued that post-resurrection Jesus’s brothers came to faith, with 1 Corinthians 9:5 saying that they took believing wives, although some disagreement surrounding whether this was describing the literal or metaphorical brothers, referring to believers (Long, 122). According to tradition, the family of Jesus began spreading the Gospel from Nazareth, tending to stay along the Transjordan area. The grandsons of Jude, Zachariah, and James were brought before Domitian, believing that they may be enemies of the state, but are eventually identified as farmers and not revolutionaries (Long, 122). If tradition surrounding the authorship of this text is taken seriously, then following Jesus’s resurrection, Jude became a follower of his brother, and spread the Gospel throughout the region, writing this short letter to respond to false teaching.
I think it is very interesting that Jude did not introduce himself as a brother of Jesus. Him introducing himself saying, “Jude, a servant of Jesus Christ and brother of James…” shows that ultimately, he is a follower of Jesus Christ. (Jude1). The thought that he was a brother of Jesus is crazy already, but him letting people know he was ultimately a follower of who He believed in. Jude takes into account who Jesus ultimately is, and humbly acknowledges it by not even mentioning their relationship. Another thing that I thought interesting from this post was that Jude may not have been a believer until after the resurrection. I always just assumed that being a sibling of Jesus, you would have no other choice but to believe in Him, because well He would have been right there. However, now thinking about it, it does make some sense. Sometimes siblings fight, they argue, and they do not want to agree with each other. For Jude, I would assume it would be hard to be a sibling of Jesus, just because of who Jesus is.
It is important to know who Jude is within the book of Jude in the bible. I am going to be completely honest, I do know many of the individuals who are authors of the Bible but one thing that Long (2010) stated that I did not know was that Jude is the author of his book and he is also the brother of James who was a servant of Jesus. While reading the book of Jude I believe it is important to know his relations to others in the Bible especially him being the brother of James but also the brother of Jesus. While reading through Jude, there is no direct statement of Jude being one of Jesus’ brothers which is important to note. Another statement that was interesting to me was that Jude and James, both brothers of Jesus, were unbelievers of Jesus until after his resurrection (Long, 2010) which is an important piece of information within the book of Jude. With Jude being the brother of Jesus it is mind-boggling to me that he did not have belief in Jesus while he lived through Jesus’ life. Luckily, Jude eventually came to the belief in Christ which is the most important outcome of the information given from Jude’s backstory.
One credit that I would like to give Professor Long in his blog post this week is the fact that he figured out that there were about 13 different words that were used in the Book of Jude that are not used anywhere else in the New Testament. After hearing this, I wanted to ponder my thoughts about this with my being but I have no thoughts of explanation for this. Another topic that I was excited to hear about, and that I highlighted above, is that Jude eventually came to believe in Christ. Like how could Jude not believe in Christ after experiencing Jesus’ ministry as well as seeing Jesus being killed on the cross and being resurrected?
The New Testament doesn’t provide much information about Jude, which leaves room for speculation. However, accounts from early church historians and traditions offer interesting insights into Jude’s potential role in the early Christian community. For example, Eusebius of Caesera mentioned that Jude’s grandchildren were involved in leadership in the church, which was also pointed out by Jobes and in the blog. Additionally, Epiphanius preserved a list of leaders in the Jerusalem church in which Jude appears third, along with James and Simon, who happen to be the names of Jesus’ brothers as well (Jobes, 237). Although there is room for speculation, many other reasons support the idea that Jude, the author of the Letter, was the brother of Jesus. While the text itself doesn’t explicitly state this connection, these reasons add depth to our understanding of the context in which the letter was written. Jude’s humility in referring to himself as a servant of Jesus rather than explicitly as his brother reflects a profound acknowledgment of Jesus’ authority, especially considering his initial skepticism. Overall, whether or not Jude was indeed Jesus’ brother is uncertain, but his letter remains a valuable part of the Biblical canon, offering timeless wisdom and warnings against false teachings which are very prominent in our modern times.
When talking about Jude Jesus’s brother I think it’s very interesting because none of Jesus’s Brothers were believers when Jesus was alive and doing his ministry. It was only after his death on the cross and his resurrection that they believed their brother was the son of God. An example of this would be in John 7:5 which says “For not even his brothers believed in him. Jesus said to them, “My time has not yet come, but your time is always here. The world cannot hate you, but it hates me because I testify about it that its works are evil.” I will admit if I were in their shoes and I had a brother that was claiming to be the son of God I would have trouble believing it too. This is one of the reasons as to why the early church accepted the book of Judas because he was Jesus’s brother and how he went from a man who didn’t believe his own brother to becoming a believer and helping kick off the early church ministry. One thing P long mentioned in his blog was the rare words used by the author in the book of Jude and how they were words not commonly used for someone who grew up in a place like Galilee. I think this shows that even though Jude was a son of a carpenter he knew his scripture and he was quite educated.
The Epistle of Jude is attributed to its author, Jude, who identifies himself simply as the brother of James and a servant of Jesus Christ. Among many individuals named Jude in the New Testament, the most plausible candidate for the authorship is Jude, the brother of Jesus. Despite this potential familial connection, Jude does not explicitly mention his relationship with Jesus in the letter, instead referring to himself as a servant of Jesus. This choice may reflect a humble acknowledgment of Jesus’ Lordship, particularly considering Jude’s initial unbelief and subsequent conversion after the resurrection. To identify Jude as the brother of Jesus arise from the language of the epistle, which appears too Hellenistic for someone who grew up in Galilee. Little is actually known about Jude, the brother of Jesus, from the New Testament. He is mentioned simply as a brother of Jesus in Matthew 13:55 and Mark 6:3. While it’s likely that he was not a believer during Jesus’ ministry, he likely became one after the resurrection, although details of his conversion remain unknown. Tradition suggests that Jude and the other brothers of Jesus were involved in missionary activity, and their descendants were reportedly arrested during the reign of Domitian. The reliance of Jude’s epistle on the Hebrew Bible suggests a familiarity with Jewish scripture, similar to his brother James. This proficiency could have enabled Jude to effectively combat false teachings within Jewish Christian communities.While the tradition of Jude being the brother of Jesus helps contextualize the acceptance of the epistle as canonical, it is not explicitly necessary for understanding the text itself. The focus remains on the content and message of the epistle, rather than the author’s familial background.
The Epistle of Jude’s original authorship being attributed to the brother of Jesus raises some very interesting questions about why he chose to refer to himself as the “servant of Jesus Christ” rather than mentioning his closer connection that he has with him. This choice could have been because of his acknowledgment of Jesus’ supreme authority, which is actually significant considering he may not have initially believed in Jesus’ divinity along with his brothers until after the resurrection had happened. Even though there were objections about the language used in the epistle, there was no conclusive evidence to suggest that Jude’s background in Galilee’s Semitic influences would have hindered his ability to create a text with both Semitic and Hellenistic elements. During that time, many Jews were exposed to various cultures and languages, given the region’s diverse population. While Jude’s relationship to Jesus is very well known, there wasn’t a lot of information provided about his life or conversion in the New Testament. Traditional tales highlight many different aspects of Jude’s life, including his missionary work and the mythical encounter of his grandsons with Domitian. Although these stories may not be historically accurate, they did emphasize Jude’s importance in early Christian circles. His use of Hebrew scripture in his writings also indicates a deep understanding of Jewish teachings, much like his brother James. This knowledge most likely aided him in addressing false interpretations circulating among Jewish Christian communities. The belief that Jude was related to Jesus may provide context for why his letter was included in the biblical canon, but it does not diminish the authority of its message. The main focus of Jude’s epistle rests on its theological content provided rather than the personal background of its author.
This Blog post was interesting to me because the writer of the letter of Jude in the Bible might be Jesus’ brother, but he doesn’t clearly say so. Instead, he calls himself a “servant of Jesus Christ” to show he respects Jesus as his leader, especially since he didn’t believe in Jesus during his lifetime. Some people wonder if Jude, from Galilee, could have written such a smart letter. But even though it has tricky words, he probably learned a lot from studying other old texts. We don’t know much about Jude from the Bible, except that he believed in Jesus after He came back to life. People say he might have helped spread Jesus’ teachings, but some stories about his family might not be true. Still, Jude’s letter is full of warnings about false teachings and encourages people to stick to their faith. Jude says we should “defend the faith that God has entrusted once for all time to his holy people” (Jude 1:3). This shows he really cares about protecting the true teachings of God and Jesus. Even though knowing Jude’s background might help, it’s not necessary to understand his message. His letter tells us that no matter what, we need to stay strong in our faith. And he reminds us that God “is able to keep you from falling away and will bring you with great joy into his glorious presence without a single fault” (Jude 1:24). Meaning God’s presence in our lives, will be perfect with no hesitation or fault’s.